GNU bug report logs - #67765
ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Daniel Hofstetter <dhofstet <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 09:40:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#67765: closed (ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:41:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:39:58 +0000
with message-id <80cb09d6-1275-15a5-72ce-8eb66452e263 <at> draigBrady.com>
and subject line Re: bug#67765: ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67765,
regarding ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
67765: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67765
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Daniel Hofstetter <dhofstet <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
Subject: ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 10:38:56 +0100
Hi,

The manual entry for -f on
https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/Sorting-the-output.html#index-_002df-9
contains:

"[...] This is equivalent to the combination of --all (-a),
--sort=none (-U), -1, --color=none, and --hyperlink=none [...]."

The "-1" option seems to be incorrect because "ls -f" lists more than
one file per line with ls 9.4.

Regards,
Daniel


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com>
To: Daniel Hofstetter <dhofstet <at> gmail.com>, 67765-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#67765: ls: manual entry for -f mentions incorrect option
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:39:58 +0000
On 11/12/2023 09:38, Daniel Hofstetter wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The manual entry for -f on
> https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/Sorting-the-output.html#index-_002df-9
> contains:
> 
> "[...] This is equivalent to the combination of --all (-a),
> --sort=none (-U), -1, --color=none, and --hyperlink=none [...]."
> 
> The "-1" option seems to be incorrect because "ls -f" lists more than
> one file per line with ls 9.4.

Right, that description regressed in coreutils 9.0.
I've pushed a fix.

Marking this as done.

thanks,
Pádraig



This bug report was last modified 1 year and 163 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.