From unknown Tue Aug 19 01:58:57 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#67750 <67750@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#67750 <67750@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: (no subject) Reply-To: bug#67750 <67750@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:58:57 +0000 retitle 67750 (no subject) reassign 67750 guix-patches submitter 67750 dziltener@lyrion.ch severity 67750 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 10 09:29:09 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2023 14:29:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCKnt-0007nh-CG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:29:09 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:49400) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCKnr-0007n9-Bx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:29:08 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCKnX-0002go-Nx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:28:47 -0500 Received: from 195-15-241-199.dc3-a.pub1.etik-cloud.com ([195.15.241.199] helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCKnV-0006HZ-OF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:28:47 -0500 X-Spam: yes X-Spam-Score: 7.9 / 15 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.900 required=15.000 tests=[ARC_NA=0.000, ASN=0.000, BROKEN_HEADERS=8.000 FROM_EQ_ENVFROM=0.000, FROM_HAS_DN=0.000, MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM=0.000 MIME_GOOD=-0.100, MIME_TRACE=0.000, RCPT_COUNT_TWO=0.000 RCVD_COUNT_ONE=0.000, RCVD_TLS_ALL=0.000, RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH=0.000 TO_DN_NONE=0.000, TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL=0.000] Received: from localhost ( [2a06:6880:42c:1600:67d0:57e5:1957:c655]) by lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f6df46ef (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 10 Dec 2023 14:28:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.15.241.199; envelope-from=dziltener@lyrion.ch; helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud X-Spam_score_int: 43 X-Spam_score: 4.3 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam_report: (4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_DATE=1.36, MISSING_FROM=1, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.799, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action From: dziltener@lyrion.ch Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 09:28:47 -0500 X-Spam-Score: 4.1 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From f4001dd77c56c77e135343c630033619a5cca2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Ziltener Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] guix: chicken-build-system: fi [...] Content analysis details: (4.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom; id=dziltener%40lyrion.ch; ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17; r=debbugs.gnu.org] 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: From f4001dd77c56c77e135343c630033619a5cca2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Ziltener Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] guix: chicken-build-system: fi [...] Content analysis details: (3.1 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.9 SPF_FAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (fail) [SPF failed: Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?s=mfrom;id=dziltener%40lyrion.ch;ip=2001%3A470%3A142%3A%3A17;r=debbugs.gnu.org] 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager >From f4001dd77c56c77e135343c630033619a5cca2e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Ziltener Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] guix: chicken-build-system: fixes to make it actually work To: guix-patches@gnu.org Cc: dziltener@lyrion.ch --- guix/build-system/chicken.scm | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- guix/build/chicken-build-system.scm | 17 ++++------ 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/guix/build-system/chicken.scm b/guix/build-system/chicken.scm index 9f518e66e6..17c3b7b144 100644 --- a/guix/build-system/chicken.scm +++ b/guix/build-system/chicken.scm @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@ (define %chicken-build-system-modules ,@%gnu-build-system-modules)) (define (default-chicken) + "Return the default Chicken package." ;; Lazily resolve the binding to avoid a circular dependency. - ;; TODO is this actually needed in every build system? (let ((chicken (resolve-interface '(gnu packages chicken)))) (module-ref chicken 'chicken))) @@ -77,18 +77,32 @@ (define private-keywords ,@native-inputs)) (outputs outputs) (build chicken-build) - (arguments (strip-keyword-arguments private-keywords arguments))))) + (arguments + (substitute-keyword-arguments + (strip-keyword-arguments private-keywords arguments) + ((#:extra-directories extra-directories) + `(list ,@(append-map + (lambda (name) + (match (assoc name inputs) + ((_ pkg) + (match (package-transitive-propagated-inputs pkg) + (((propagated-names . _) ...) + (cons name propagated-names)))))) + extra-directories)))))))) (define* (chicken-build name inputs #:key source (phases '%standard-phases) - (outputs '("out")) + (outputs '("out" "static")) (search-paths '()) (egg-name "") (unpack-path "") (build-flags ''()) + (configure-flags ''()) + (extra-directories ''()) (tests? #t) + (parallel-build? #f) (system (%current-system)) (guile #f) (imported-modules %chicken-build-system-modules) @@ -99,19 +113,23 @@ (define builder (with-imported-modules imported-modules #~(begin (use-modules #$@(sexp->gexp modules)) - (chicken-build #:name #$name - #:source #+source - #:system #$system - #:phases #$phases - #:outputs #$(outputs->gexp outputs) - #:search-paths '#$(sexp->gexp - (map search-path-specification->sexp - search-paths)) - #:egg-name #$egg-name - #:unpack-path #$unpack-path - #:build-flags #$build-flags - #:tests? #$tests? - #:inputs #$(input-tuples->gexp inputs))))) + #$(with-build-variables inputs-outputs + #~(chicken-build #:name #$name + #:source #+source + #:system #$system + #:phases #$phases + #:configure-flags #$configure-flags + #:extra-directories #$extra-directories + #:parallel-build? #$parallel-build? + #:outputs #$(outputs->gexp outputs) + #:search-paths '#$(sexp->gexp + (map search-path-specification->sexp + search-paths)) + #:egg-name #$egg-name + #:unpack-path #$unpack-path + #:build-flags #$build-flags + #:tests? #$tests? + #:inputs #$(input-tuples->gexp inputs)))))) (mlet %store-monad ((guile (package->derivation (or guile (default-guile)) system #:graft? #f))) diff --git a/guix/build/chicken-build-system.scm b/guix/build/chicken-build-system.scm index 8f9f59cc25..6a4f0c43eb 100644 --- a/guix/build/chicken-build-system.scm +++ b/guix/build/chicken-build-system.scm @@ -42,13 +42,12 @@ (define (chicken-package? name) (define* (setup-chicken-environment #:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) (setenv "CHICKEN_INSTALL_REPOSITORY" - (string-concatenate - ;; see TODO item about binary version above - (append (list (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/var/lib/chicken/11/") - (let ((oldenv (getenv "CHICKEN_INSTALL_REPOSITORY"))) - (if oldenv - (list ":" oldenv) - '()))))) + (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/var/lib/chicken/11/")) + (setenv "CHICKEN_INSTALL_PREFIX" + (string-append (assoc-ref outputs "out") "/bin/")) + (setenv "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH" + (string-append (getenv "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH") + ":" (getenv "CHICKEN_INSTALL_REPOSITORY"))) (setenv "CHICKEN_EGG_CACHE" (getcwd)) #t) @@ -104,10 +103,6 @@ (define* (check #:key egg-name tests? #:allow-other-keys) ;; there is no "-test-only" option, but we've already run install ;; so this just runs tests. ;; i think it's a fair assumption that phases won't be reordered. - (setenv "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH" - (string-append (getenv "CHICKEN_INSTALL_REPOSITORY") - ":" - (getenv "CHICKEN_REPOSITORY_PATH"))) (when tests? (invoke "chicken-install" "-cached" "-test" "-no-install" egg-name))) -- 2.43.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 10 10:32:46 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2023 15:32:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51635 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCLnS-0001xK-8j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:32:46 -0500 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:60196) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCLnP-0001x8-UU for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:32:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=tLpMUg4jadcYp97 ILVR3GERtwrOhRYo3X+KfMbL09H8=; h=date:cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=E/ 5pVGNLBOQ6iD5vMuF+8HEZxmQKlBd70zGsQF1XUB/OnEo+vXdZI5Fh8UahpAjN37kEkjfe O3TmmYrxC4mbbZJ8vw5kseReWnmdFKtptLTbJUPvb6ak+wfROsm2iYwNXKjgVPrwjdwyeI AM26ru5ikPLL8LrVCPwKP61ChAbtA= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a81336f7 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:32:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Felix Lechner To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 07:32:27 -0800 Message-ID: <87zfyi5b04.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: reassign 67750 guix-patches thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control Cc: Daniel Ziltener X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) reassign 67750 guix-patches thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Dec 10 11:07:57 2023 Received: (at 67750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2023 16:07:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51679 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCMLV-0005aa-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:07:57 -0500 Received: from 195-15-241-199.dc3-a.pub1.etik-cloud.com ([195.15.241.199]:50132 helo=lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCMLP-0005aF-3n for 67750@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:07:55 -0500 Received: from [IPV6:2a06:6880:42c:1600:67d0:57e5:1957:c655] ( [2a06:6880:42c:1600:67d0:57e5:1957:c655]) by lyrion.dc3-a.pub1.infomaniak.cloud (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b426ec00 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <67750@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 16:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 17:07:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 To: 67750@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: (no subject) Content-Language: en-US From: Daniel Ziltener Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you. I am sorry about the missing subjects for the bugs. I only just realized my mistake there. Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67750 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you. I am sorry about the missing subjects for the bugs. I only just realized my mistake there. Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [195.15.241.199 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Thank you. I am sorry about the missing subjects for the bugs. I only just realized my mistake there. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 08 04:52:20 2024 Received: (at 67750) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2024 09:52:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1riWto-0002v7-59 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 04:52:20 -0500 Received: from 195-15-241-199.dc3-a.pub1.etik-cloud.com ([195.15.241.199]:49004 helo=lyrion.ch) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1riWtm-0002uw-0R; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 04:52:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lyrion.ch; s=20230702; t=1709891504; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jDVHi5meah0k+tqdOi0LdeDviUjXSJkRm9JSnbohoeo=; b=vL36cQ3nm6nxmJXPY+PTO4l24L9ss9Xq+cghNFt2cxrCh3DS5aNbHsPx408XGy5W+f6x9U Ty2iGOXchBW4hgXpUSvgZG0OQTweWXWFmDn+7XgLI1JrRxd0RPl6L3+yTDgvZAjvfgiuLX 2Zk/hyMmnv9e1/ze1FNae7mocC66lgNwuGDNEJXWVEGq8BdHRWWMlRKiP+Dw9Jfe+8fCTh 67SixQ0xjKDt2M+ZMeoSZBRqY64QWfTzwTs/We6QBpJdXZln14VSCw3Q1+funaZs3JrzRT ts+VVJye+xJ8QsI+ftibe2fItzYBjwoX7TxLMM6TxJXY0vC6kS63ussvJ2Dkrw== Received: from [IPV6:2a06:6880:42c:1600:50f3:a754:c01:3b8a] ( [2a06:6880:42c:1600:50f3:a754:c01:3b8a]) by lyrion.ch (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3087c865 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <022d3bf6-7646-4440-9aef-942aa3e4934d@lyrion.ch> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:51:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Content-Language: en-US To: 67750@debbugs.gnu.org From: Daniel Ziltener Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 67750 thanks Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 67750 Cc: control@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: close 67750 thanks Content analysis details: (1.4 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 SLIGHTLY_BAD_SUBJECT Subject contains something slightly spammy -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager close 67750 thanks From unknown Tue Aug 19 01:58:57 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2024 11:24:27 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator