GNU bug report logs -
#67714
“guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”
Previous Next
Full log
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hi,
Using Guix aabfddb (Oct 2023),
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build racket-minimal --no-grafts -d
/gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell racket-minimal --no-grafts --dry-run
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
The following derivations would be built:
/gnu/store/vy5y76f25ni3kxjfa8x6c3rjgvrvach1-profile.drv
/gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, the derivations are not the same and their output neither.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build /gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/rvvyiy90dh2dpwn52r84xx4rsvvijz8q-racket-minimal-8.10
$ guix build /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/f2vky2mswm2h7w3jjiw7s28d25kzbmrl-racket-minimal-8.10
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Hum?! Looking more closely, their builder reads,
From “guix build”:
(apply invoke racket
"/gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt"
From “guix shell”:
(apply invoke racket
"/gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt"
And the bug is:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff \
/gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt \
/gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt
diff: /gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt: No such file or directory
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Well, on more more recent revisions, e.g., 06f25a9a85, I am not able to
reproduce. Other said, I am not able to tell if the bug had been fixed
or if it is not hit.
Cheers,
simon
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 274 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.