GNU bug report logs - #67714
“guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 17:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#67714: closed (“guix build
 racket” different from “guix shell
 racket”)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 18:35:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2023 19:33:49 +0100
with message-id <CAJ3okZ3vwSqbT7AVLenkegYYN99U_PBxPxFMA0H4JA_i47CwvQ <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#67714: “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #67714,
regarding “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
67714: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67714
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: “guix build racket”
 different from “guix shell racket”
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 17:45:09 +0100
Hi,

Using Guix aabfddb (Oct 2023),

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build racket-minimal --no-grafts -d
/gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix shell racket-minimal --no-grafts --dry-run
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
The following derivations would be built:
  /gnu/store/vy5y76f25ni3kxjfa8x6c3rjgvrvach1-profile.drv
  /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, the derivations are not the same and their output neither.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build /gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/rvvyiy90dh2dpwn52r84xx4rsvvijz8q-racket-minimal-8.10

$ guix build /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
/gnu/store/f2vky2mswm2h7w3jjiw7s28d25kzbmrl-racket-minimal-8.10
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Hum?!  Looking more closely, their builder reads,

From “guix build”:

  (apply invoke racket
  "/gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt"

From “guix shell”:

  (apply invoke racket
  "/gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt"

And the bug is:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ diff \
  /gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt \
  /gnu/store/3k9f2j9arycxd5r6fw1dpidj51pbv41n-configure-layer.rkt
diff: /gnu/store/xgaj5m1yhyrc80jhx9djsvg4r7lgrz05-configure-layer.rkt: No such file or directory
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Well, on more more recent revisions, e.g., 06f25a9a85, I am not able to
reproduce.  Other said, I am not able to tell if the bug had been fixed
or if it is not hit.

Cheers,
simon



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 67714-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#67714: “guix build racket” different from “guix shell racket”
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 19:33:49 +0100
Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 19:08, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> This is likely <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66662>, fixed on Oct. 27th
> with commit 67effc1560fc175dfbcb58ef5b965b08b3942d6c.

Cool!  Thanks for the quick answer.  You saved me some investigation time. :-)

> I guess we can close if it’s not reproducible now?

Yeah, done.

Cheers,
simon


This bug report was last modified 1 year and 274 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.