Subject: Re: bug#67714: “guix build racket” different from “guix shellracket”

From: Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 19:08:27 +0100

Hi,

Simon Tournier <[email-masked]> skribis:

> Using Guix aabfddb (Oct 2023),
>
> $ guix build racket-minimal --no-grafts -d
> /gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
>
> $ guix shell racket-minimal --no-grafts --dry-run
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
> substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
> The following derivations would be built:
>   /gnu/store/vy5y76f25ni3kxjfa8x6c3rjgvrvach1-profile.drv
>   /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
>
>
> Well, the derivations are not the same and their output neither.
>
> $ guix build /gnu/store/hcdvhp36c51f6854mzggacsylkks24jj-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
> /gnu/store/rvvyiy90dh2dpwn52r84xx4rsvvijz8q-racket-minimal-8.10
>
> $ guix build /gnu/store/jxbm1inf8mj7fvs8z9xxxcrlqv9i1hs7-racket-minimal-8.10.drv
> /gnu/store/f2vky2mswm2h7w3jjiw7s28d25kzbmrl-racket-minimal-8.10

This is likely <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66662>, fixed on Oct. 27th
with commit 67effc1560fc175dfbcb58ef5b965b08b3942d6c.

I guess we can close if it’s not reproducible now?

Thanks,
Ludo’.