GNU bug report logs -
#67686
[PATCH core-updates 0/5] Update glibc to 2.38; make C.UTF-8 always available
Previous Next
Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 10:21:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #85 received at 67686 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello!
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:
> On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 10:26:36PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...]
>> I was told on #glibc that (1) there’s no ‘localedef’ for the build
>> machine produced during cross-compilation, and (2) that more generally,
>> there’s no way to cross-build locale data, that endianness and other
>> things may matter.
>>
>> I suspect #2 was about the locale archive and not locale data, because
>> evidence suggests that locale data is system-independent:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> $ for s in aarch64-linux powerpc64le-linux armhf-linux i686-linux ; do diff -r $(guix build glibc-locales <at> 2.35) $(guix build glibc-locales <at> 2.35 -s "$s") && echo "$s same as x86_64-linux" ; done
>> aarch64-linux same as x86_64-linux
>> powerpc64le-linux same as x86_64-linux
>> armhf-linux same as x86_64-linux
>> i686-linux same as x86_64-linux
>> $ guix describe
>> guix 6e2dd51
>> repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
>> branch: master
>> commit: 6e2dd51df5f3f51e9056dd4f2e1b036195ab3caa
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> Efraim, could you check against powerpc-linux, which is the only
>> big-endian target we +/- support?
>
> I found a difference in almost every file. The tarball of the locales
> was too big to attach so I've uploaded it here¹. Looking at it in
> diffoscope it looked like most of the data that looked human readable
> was the same, but there was some endian switching with the other data
> bits. So without actually checking other big endian systems it looks
> like we could set target #f for the locales, but for those that share
> their endianness.
OK, interesting, thanks for checking!
So we won’t be able to reliably provide C.UTF-8 in cross-compiled libcs.
Maybe not a big problem, but it does mean that cross-compiled code will
be “less capable” because of that.
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 167 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.