GNU bug report logs - #67651
[gnome-team] What should we do with the "gnome" package?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>

Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 20:57:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
Subject: bug#67651: closed ([gnome-team] What should we do with the
 "gnome" package?)
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 17:05:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#67651: [gnome-team] What should we do with the "gnome" package?

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 67651 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
67651: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=67651
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
To: 67651-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [gnome-team] What should we do with the "gnome" package?
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2024 18:04:25 +0100
This is being worked on at https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68716

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Vivien Kraus <vivien <at> planete-kraus.eu>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [gnome-team] What should we do with the "gnome" package?
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 21:55:56 +0100
Dear guix,

On the one hand, we have this list of packages:
https://ftp2.nluug.nl/windowing/gnome/teams/releng/44.6/versions

On the other hand, we have the propagated-inputs of the gnome package.

Should we update the latter so that it contains everything from the
former? What should we do about the comments dividing the propagated-
inputs into categories? Where do these categories come from? Should we
preserve them? How do we know which package goes to which category?

The gnome package disables eog on 32-bit machines because it depends on
librsvg-next. It seems a bit outdated to me, as most of gnome won’t
work on 32-bit machines, not only eog. Should we try and find which
ones work on 32-bit systems?

Best regards,

Vivien



This bug report was last modified 1 year and 108 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.