GNU bug report logs - #67628
Emacs 29.1: (x-open-connection (getenv "DISPLAY")) gets "Display :0.0 does not exist" error

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 67628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: mahlamytsike <at> gmail.com, 67628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#67628: Emacs 29.1: (x-open-connection (getenv "DISPLAY"))
 gets "Display :0.0 does not exist" error
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2023 20:21:36 +0800

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Herman <mahlamytsike <at> gmail.com>,  67628 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2023 20:37:00 +0800
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> If in 29.1 now 
>> >> $ emacs --daemon -Q
>> >> $ emacsclient -e "(setq debug-on-error t)"
>> >> then 
>> >> $ emacsclient -e "(make-frame-on-display (getenv \"DISPLAY\"))"
>> >> does not give an error, i.e. the display is found
>> >> 
>> >> but if
>> >> $ emacs --daemon -Q
>> >> $ emacsclient -e "(setq debug-on-error t)"
>> >> then
>> >> $ emacsclient -e "(x-open-connection (getenv \"DISPLAY\"))"
>> >> gives an error, i.e. the display does not exist.
>> >
>> > Po Lu, any ideas or suggestions?
>> 
>> The display is opened successfully, but the next event to arrive
>> activates the dynamic-setting machinery that calls get-device-terminal,
>> which signals an error in response to there being no frames on that
>> display at the time.
>
> So you are saying that this is an issue with the fine timing of when
> the event arrives?  And if it arrived a bit later, it would have been
> processed correctly?

No, see below.

>> The sound fix is for get-device-terminal to search for the device
>> provided within x_display_list instead of the list of live frames.
>
> I'm not sure this is the correct fix.  If a frame is not yet in the
> list of live frames exposed to Lisp, it might mean the frame is not
> yet fully set up, and some code running off the dynamic-setting
> machinery could similarly fail, right?
>
> Wouldn't it be better to delay the processing of this event until the
> frame is fully set?

There's no frame being created halfway in this scenario.  Rather, a
display connection is opened _without_ creating any frames, from which a
dynamic-setting event subsequently arrives.

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.