GNU bug report logs - #67535
ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 20:56:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 67535 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Richard Sent <richard <at> freakingpenguin.com>
To: guix-devel <at> gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: 67535 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: Does anyone use i686-linux? [was Re: bug#67535: ci.guix.gnu.org 'Cannot allocate memory' while building for i686-linux]
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:00:36 -0400
>> In terms of side-stepping the question, do we have enough x86_64
>> hardware to continue to support i686 without degrading support for
>> x86_64? (I ask this seriously, although I'm pretty certain the answer is
>> we're well covered on that front.)
>
>Support does not just mean dedicating build cycles to doomed builds, but
>also dedicating people's time to wade through hundreds of failures for
>little gain.  Perhaps our time is better spent supporting architectures
>that still have a future.
>

For consideration, I know at least one 3rd-party channel relies on being able to create a multiarch container containing i686 packages. I'll refrain from linking since it packages nonfree software. This is an example where keeping an old architecture around is more complicated than simply counting the number of active machines using said architecture.

Perhaps we could tally the number of substitutes served for supported architectures and use that as our metric for liveliness.





This bug report was last modified 191 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.