Subject: bug#67520: 29.1; Mention headers

From: Eric Abrahamsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:31:14 -0800

Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]> writes:

>> From: Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:49:18 +0800
>> 
>> This docstring should mention the case where the user wants to forward
>> the entire message, including pristine headers.
>> 
>> He tries each in vain, finding that none include the headers.
>> 
>> C-c C-f runs the command gnus-summary-mail-forward (found in
>> gnus-summary-mode-map), which is an autoloaded interactive
>> native-compiled Lisp function in ‘gnus-msg.el’.
>> 
>> It is bound to C-c C-f and S o m.
>> 
>> (gnus-summary-mail-forward &optional ARG POST)
>> 
>> Forward the current message(s) to another user.
>> If process marks exist, forward all marked messages;
>> if ARG is nil, see ‘message-forward-as-mime’ and ‘message-forward-show-mml’;
>> if ARG is 1, decode the message and forward directly inline;
>> if ARG is 2, forward message as an rfc822 MIME section;
>> if ARG is 3, decode message and forward as an rfc822 MIME section;
>> if ARG is 4, forward message directly inline;
>> otherwise, use flipped ‘message-forward-as-mime’.
>> If POST, post instead of mail.
>> For the "inline" alternatives, also see the variable
>> ‘message-forward-ignored-headers’.
>
> Eric, any comments?

I didn't understand the request. The docstring should mention that none
of the calling options for `gnus-summary-mail-forward' include the all
the original headers?