GNU bug report logs - #67405
[PATCH] Update fftw3

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Mehmet Tekman <mtekman89 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:00:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #13 received at 67405-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Mehmet Tekman <mtekman89 <at> gmail.com>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 67405-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#67405] [PATCH] Update fftw3
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2023 20:59:12 +0100
Hello Mathieu,

I was wondering if you could advise me best on how to handle
this related patch (fftw-cmake):

https://patches.guix-patches.cbaines.net/project/guix-patches/patch/87o7fmu8or.fsf <at> gmail.com/

It's a direct clone of fftw, but built with cmake-build instead of gnu-build.
The reason is that the gnu-build doesn't generate the required *.cmake
files required in a dependent package (krita):

https://patches.guix-patches.cbaines.net/project/guix-patches/patch/87il5uu5tt.fsf <at> gmail.com/

The cmake-build provides all the required *.cmake files for the library, but has
none of the CPU-optimisations in the gnu-build.

Do you know how I can proceed with this? Is it bad etiquette to have a package
that is a direct source clone of another, only built differently?

Best,
Mehmet




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 233 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.