GNU bug report logs - #67393
29.1; Slow to open file if autosave exists

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: materus213 <materus213 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:35:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 29.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #54 received at 67393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Cc: materus213 <at> gmail.com, 67393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com,
 juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: Re: bug#67393: 29.1; Slow to open file if autosave exists
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 19:34:51 +0200
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: juri <at> linkov.net, stefankangas <at> gmail.com, materus213 <at> gmail.com,
>  67393 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 17:18:42 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > And having said that, I'm not sure this is a good idea even if we
> > present enough context.  For starters, many messages must be acted
> > upon immediately.
> 
> I'd argue that messages that _must_ be acted, should not be messages.
> They should query user for action instead of blocking Emacs and not
> allowing to do anything other than C-g.

You do realize that this is contrary to everything we currently do in
Emacs, right?  We should the messages that must be acted upon
immediately, and use sit-for to make sure the user sees the message
and has an opportunity to act upon it.  The message which started this
discussion was just like that: it informed the user that an autosave
file exists, so the user should consider using it.

> > Thanks, but this would mean a complete redesign of the Emacs messaging
> > UI.  This kind of display no longer fits the mini-window paradigm we
> > are using, it will need a separate large enough window for showing
> > series of messages (in which case we don't need to much wizardry to
> > scroll through them and selectively delete them).  Do we really want
> > to make such drastic changes in our UI?
> 
> I believe that such changes would be helpful.

Maybe so, but this will be an entirely different UX, and probably an
entirely different Emacs.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.