From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12801977211679 (code B ref -1); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:29:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 02:28:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuK-0000R2-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:40 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuI-0000Qx-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:33681) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuP-0001rq-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:45 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41575 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdZuO-000176-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuM-00079s-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:44333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuM-00079k-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:42 -0400 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so413111yxs.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUuJJ2NXPO5k1XKU3/3pj/OGZaGhcrNGNbmPLieH7oE=; b=u8Bnq7v4TzEzFVZm9Z2aaW0pAwVpWGN3EkgY6wXjQbJjhoaqMbZzBTBnFfKosJp5qP rWBdY9UiBb18+4pyRH03A49hxAXDRbDebZf/jdp6xmMwTRm0QkkNiSFEndb98NpXgyj8 rpV4f/DSD25rHnVRgkOXRj+Sh9RsWwCO8d2HI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m5uOSw0V4vL734lp2FoDoZgJyOTUKp1hxkjJtdylSaHUdSn2OqRsZ3SJbvV44nfnwc e3Xw6LV4F4IvaFr01TSibHYudTtKHxxZ2WyFuX9rQntzTtVYFcXoPD6JyCOaoq+xI+Ib gI+d4T7Hnb58ONQg97gxhoVqHzM7NJyAXr1ss= Received: by 10.100.164.6 with SMTP id m6mr8867566ane.54.1280197721895; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (97-122-118-250.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.118.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7sm7639437anb.15.2010.07.26.19.28.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:28:39 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) According to the documentation in nt/INSTALL, `make maintainer-clean' is supposed to "Remove everything that can be recreated, including compiled lisp files, to get back to the state of a fresh Bazaar tree." Running `mingw32-make maintainer-clean' on Windows 7, GnuWin32 and MinGW does not seem to do exactly that. Per Juanma's suggestion I ran bzr clean-tree --unknown --ignored --detritus --force and it produced the following output: deleting paths: bin site-lisp admin/unidata/makefile lisp/cedet/ede/loaddefs.el~ lisp/cedet/semantic/loaddefs.el~ lisp/cedet/srecode/loaddefs.el~ This was right after a `mingw32-make maintainer-clean'. The bin/ directory still contained the following files: cmdproxy.exe The site-lisp/ directory contained: subdirs.el `make realclean' deletes ../bin eventually. Shouldn't `maintainer-clean' do the same if it claims to restore the fresh tree checkout? Christoph From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Jason Rumney Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christoph Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.128023656523251 (code B ref 6736); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 13:16:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Odk0q-00062y-6P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:16:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com ([74.125.83.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Odk0o-00062c-IF for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 09:16:03 -0400 Received: by pvd12 with SMTP id 12so410365pvd.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:16:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=HGzeZ0/Vz+KtvwkF+ecjCg5D+rsEr1GNwOiHerAgrdk=; b=mGGDv6twVazb9NSU8ACdava7I6FKhrTStzYMx1pf7Ohso3xIfcUeU+xbipqbpwSIxH UGgfxRMDZNoAQgzyUs0nFiPKWytwFLvBsoIxeUDhdLt/ZagkFHxv06dOHwSrw9tfGc0Q t1aAh5YdLaNEFadmL7UGhMRuuX3UZjjp64uiM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=w5KAs5ZDvfjzUserFevxZ1swDZac9XuRTjzTebg+FLp+qAN62h6FS1BFFU41ZSZHN1 SSVnlCTFteC62uRYPqa90AkqHkA+MgxpWy19WPxFel82dw2n87oiFPTWLtmzqzPSb8RE L3qTPVcDsGaWoFr0coo7oS32TJhqvkZXP72PY= Received: by 10.142.144.2 with SMTP id r2mr10342711wfd.266.1280236569782; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([202.87.221.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm5637956wfd.15.2010.07.27.06.16.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:16:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDBC5AD6; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:16:00 +0800 (MYT) From: Jason Rumney References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:16:00 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> (Christoph's message of "Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:28:39 -0600") Message-ID: <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) Christoph writes: > The bin/ directory still contained the following files: cmdproxy.exe > The site-lisp/ directory contained: subdirs.el > > `make realclean' deletes ../bin eventually. Shouldn't > maintainer-clean' do the same if it claims to restore the fresh tree > checkout? I'm not sure. Anything in ../bin is put there by "make install". I'm pretty sure make maintainer-clean doesn't uninstall installed executables on other platforms either, but then those platforms will also have installed copies of other things that maintainer-clean does delete. Also if cmdproxy.exe is the only file left in ../bin, then that seems more like a buggy oversight than deliberately leaving the installed files alone. From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jason Rumney Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, 6736@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.128025012729172 (code B ref 6736); Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 17:02:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdnXa-0007aT-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:02:06 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdnXX-0007a2-Ma for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:02:04 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L6800L006KYAL00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:02:11 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.61.30]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L6800IB07BJ0SG0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:02:08 +0300 (IDT) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 20:02:10 +0300 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83wrsgamel.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) > From: Jason Rumney > Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:16:00 +0800 > Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org > > Christoph writes: > > > The bin/ directory still contained the following files: cmdproxy.exe > > The site-lisp/ directory contained: subdirs.el > > > > `make realclean' deletes ../bin eventually. Shouldn't > > maintainer-clean' do the same if it claims to restore the fresh tree > > checkout? > > I'm not sure. > > Anything in ../bin is put there by "make install". I'm pretty sure make > maintainer-clean doesn't uninstall installed executables on other platforms > either, but then those platforms will also have installed copies of > other things that maintainer-clean does delete. Also if cmdproxy.exe is > the only file left in ../bin, then that seems more like a buggy > oversight than deliberately leaving the installed files alone. I agree with Jason, FWIW. From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jason Rumney Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 6736@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.128071313329643 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 01:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 01:38:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfjzQ-0007i4-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:38:52 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfjzO-0007hy-GD for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:38:51 -0400 Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so1148521gyg.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:39:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZuSE5RW+GJ9MeXqCKThF3O7cVKwqhqHwFxqFg2dkQGE=; b=PBdKG4vmWsIOAWJg5BciqMVTxdVJlvsAkERxlI1s3TGUWtbSz7gesFtBfkZ1FPN0R6 xXOifkV7ukqTC+tJ7GYg7lGKwnnaR6IGT3QCcvdzwza1qL8V93TQVTH4BRU4LitkevQ6 uTZVDREIWjG/8yNzzH3p3+sf51xvTiYgDYluk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=upSkl6hql0CKEXvocHD8RSfBc3kD2UWG3btCf8TdaxHg1AAq+ES0gVs+NZcbbfuUFs hDgg6/B/YXEIXgzkgHa9mLPJEcSrU/p/Al+whzf31zbxYX1ouLb5r5RFdhURG9PItmRI 4wpRSfj5Rs/l4YtIMPK3WMwXv+RU1H0xZoSYk= Received: by 10.101.165.6 with SMTP id s6mr5338083ano.204.1280713152445; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (184-96-103-154.hlrn.qwest.net [184.96.103.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k11sm8717448ani.10.2010.08.01.18.39.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Aug 2010 18:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:39:06 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> In-Reply-To: <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) On 7/27/2010 7:16 AM, Jason Rumney wrote: > Anything in ../bin is put there by "make install". Actually, cmdproxy.exe is copied to bin by `make bootstrap', since (according to a comment in the makefile) it needs it during the bootstrap process. > I'm pretty sure make > maintainer-clean doesn't uninstall installed executables on other platforms > either, but then those platforms will also have installed copies of > other things that maintainer-clean does delete. Also if cmdproxy.exe is > the only file left in ../bin, then that seems more like a buggy > oversight than deliberately leaving the installed files alone. OK. What about the site-lisp directory? Is it safe to delete it too or could the user have files in it that he does not want to loose? Christoph From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 02:43:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christoph Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org, Jason Rumney Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.128071693731309 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 02:43:02 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 02:42:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofkym-00088w-Ez for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:42:16 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofkyk-00088r-Pz for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:42:15 -0400 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so3356441iwn.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:42:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mSE8nVRQ9pzz7CRQ30oTUYByea1orp79FXvF2JmxJNU=; b=U1L3PXXwXqheWfhDAoYM1FzeACX3luTrUUoXQoCPV1yPeVcj9yIKfAzdl3EZkuswyO 5x4pRp24m2kL57uBd/ov0FbDo5BhayvflB9fdOROKSvYQxJgiBPyUWGdYMkbl8u9+A7j iYBsBwz/D7ZP96n4VYDbz8IUaiCT6YNW29SF0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CzLlg8z4y8lToQ5HmApi6a8Eziafe2r7P0GCwJG+9aki7YvojAAc0zrA7TxASaxfP0 lCN+K5ASzCeij4DJKXjeXYI17ceA4yGSxnB6GQxtbfLTjK5j2zg9daMgUvYB6THo/b5M R+4wubmYlvX467pHgqcKBNk2vHQ7EhQ4egT9c= Received: by 10.231.149.80 with SMTP id s16mr6302047ibv.81.1280716956705; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 19:42:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.4 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 19:42:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 04:42:14 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 03:39, Christoph wrote: > OK. What about the site-lisp directory? Is it safe to delete it too or co= uld > the user have files in it that he does not want to loose? Isn't that the whole point of site-lisp? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org, Jason Rumney Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.1280721468645 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 03:57:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofm9s-0000AM-Hh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:57:48 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ofm9q-0000AG-52 for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 23:57:46 -0400 Received: by gwaa18 with SMTP id a18so1176761gwa.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZX0WGWQ66x+44YrzFuGpfSZEadIx1IhQrD2qIS5fbZI=; b=SDd7Tuhk9vfutEUQRw4cCLTZ85m/A/7bR4xddacQJ2s0WTUlNSfHk08kWUaz7qZcfj 5kvitZXzzkIObBf8EVu64TDdoZyZRqcFUzMxPQBKZZOfPBgp2w1lvK78IAifOAbdWDKj iqMJMRBbi0ZQv9a3DwUILgSjcMY07mVXa8RAc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pBDSfNNzErtdzJrr+SaNliJy0b0XcOA6nqQmKEcdJ5A7Zo3GIufPg7k3DU+CAHKf6A /6+a31Jye9I5rJU1N1IOkJGXV2S7x5Iw4euInl+oHUp/wfBKZtQuEgprknw8l9TQpTr6 DQlOn9MbErNljIVOXEWEVq6IkCn/K6Zxq44eA= Received: by 10.100.239.14 with SMTP id m14mr275479anh.28.1280721488253; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (184-96-103-154.hlrn.qwest.net [184.96.103.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b17sm8937846anh.5.2010.08.01.20.58.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:58:03 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On 8/1/2010 8:42 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> OK. What about the site-lisp directory? Is it safe to delete it too or could >> the user have files in it that he does not want to loose? > > Isn't that the whole point of site-lisp? Right. I guess I will rephrase the question: is there ever a situation where we SHOULD delete the site-lisp directory, specifically with `make maintainer-clean'? From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christoph Cc: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org, Jason Rumney Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.1280722225984 (code B ref 6736); Mon, 02 Aug 2010 04:11:01 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2010 04:10:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmM5-0000Fp-2D for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:25 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OfmM4-0000Fj-1r for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:10:24 -0400 Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so3426227iwn.3 for <6736@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:10:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RbI2vdzTP6qj7qC6hg9+851MnGcT1K9Wc1ZQGkFZ8x0=; b=VxZtmaOc8TwfyB7bncUzQmiRO8/xmWROJUm/+QWmNx6pd16GwdGo2A1K9LcvVQAMBJ 7QJVGcnQlCqfLXou3jT9DtYQyHrHhUFepinK1MjRaPXLaNmYKVKfZ3K+bGFSzphUGxXv plrqong0QRE8LONyNiH2XS5Qt83aQnsft0TAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DAT4twXfTWm3+sdhk+KPdjk12E7WiCk43ttwC2Rf1rqpc2ZFZV7c4DMzTD70ntIFaH dL+nywwDLA4rEVYcfW3tpzgKTI0lfwkB3omL0ons9pXBkPcZSpvqHa6Icmch3Hcj0vKe i99BXES235Hp4DskhSPKou1VCrBoMhklI2y+w= Received: by 10.231.149.207 with SMTP id u15mr6575562ibv.13.1280722246222; Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:10:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.162.4 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Aug 2010 21:10:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:10:26 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 05:58, Christoph wrote: > Right. I guess I will rephrase the question: is there ever a situation wh= ere > we SHOULD delete the site-lisp directory, specifically with `make > maintainer-clean'? Should? I don't think so. Could? If you can determine that it has nothing of value. But I don't think it's worth the trouble. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Christoph Subject: bug#6736: closed (Re: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree) Message-ID: References: <7kshq0z8zd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 6736 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 6736@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 03:59:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1481083142-6604-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1481083142-6604-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 6736@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 6736: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D6736 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1481083142-6604-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 6736-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 03:58:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58684 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cETMr-0001hM-UN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:58:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cETMr-0001gt-0P for 6736-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:58:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cETMl-0004Aq-5o for 6736-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:59 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cETMl-0004Am-2w for 6736-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:59 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cETMk-00076c-BP; Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:58 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: 6736-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> X-Spook: CNCIS high security Nigeria cypherpunk NSA Forte Strain X-Ran: huHC:Klb#D@`Z`nwdxcv)?n]C(^yh`&*U27h%L3' X-Hue: black X-Attribution: GM Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:10:26 +0200") Message-ID: <7kshq0z8zd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6736-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) I believe this report is not relevant any more, eg w32-specific makefiles were removed some time ago. ------------=_1481083142-6604-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2010 02:28:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuK-0000R2-K0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:40 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuI-0000Qx-PV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:39 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:33681) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuP-0001rq-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:45 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41575 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OdZuO-000176-2N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuM-00079s-SB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:43 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:44333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OdZuM-00079k-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:28:42 -0400 Received: by yxs7 with SMTP id 7so413111yxs.0 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WUuJJ2NXPO5k1XKU3/3pj/OGZaGhcrNGNbmPLieH7oE=; b=u8Bnq7v4TzEzFVZm9Z2aaW0pAwVpWGN3EkgY6wXjQbJjhoaqMbZzBTBnFfKosJp5qP rWBdY9UiBb18+4pyRH03A49hxAXDRbDebZf/jdp6xmMwTRm0QkkNiSFEndb98NpXgyj8 rpV4f/DSD25rHnVRgkOXRj+Sh9RsWwCO8d2HI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m5uOSw0V4vL734lp2FoDoZgJyOTUKp1hxkjJtdylSaHUdSn2OqRsZ3SJbvV44nfnwc e3Xw6LV4F4IvaFr01TSibHYudTtKHxxZ2WyFuX9rQntzTtVYFcXoPD6JyCOaoq+xI+Ib gI+d4T7Hnb58ONQg97gxhoVqHzM7NJyAXr1ss= Received: by 10.100.164.6 with SMTP id m6mr8867566ane.54.1280197721895; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (97-122-118-250.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.118.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7sm7639437anb.15.2010.07.26.19.28.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:28:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:28:39 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) According to the documentation in nt/INSTALL, `make maintainer-clean' is supposed to "Remove everything that can be recreated, including compiled lisp files, to get back to the state of a fresh Bazaar tree." Running `mingw32-make maintainer-clean' on Windows 7, GnuWin32 and MinGW does not seem to do exactly that. Per Juanma's suggestion I ran bzr clean-tree --unknown --ignored --detritus --force and it produced the following output: deleting paths: bin site-lisp admin/unidata/makefile lisp/cedet/ede/loaddefs.el~ lisp/cedet/semantic/loaddefs.el~ lisp/cedet/srecode/loaddefs.el~ This was right after a `mingw32-make maintainer-clean'. The bin/ directory still contained the following files: cmdproxy.exe The site-lisp/ directory contained: subdirs.el `make realclean' deletes ../bin eventually. Shouldn't `maintainer-clean' do the same if it claims to restore the fresh tree checkout? Christoph ------------=_1481083142-6604-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 04:14:43 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#6736: Windows: make maintainer-clean does not restore fully clean bzr tree Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6736 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Glenn Morris Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, rgm@gnu.org, 6736@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 6736-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6736.14811265591986 (code B ref 6736); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 6736) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 16:02:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeg2-0000Vy-Q1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:02:38 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEeg0-0000Vn-R3 for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:02:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEefq-0005kq-EG for 6736@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:02:31 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEefo-0005k8-VI; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:02:24 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1396 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cEefo-00050Q-1y; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:02:24 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:02:47 +0200 Message-Id: <83shpziv6g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <7kshq0z8zd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:58 -0500) References: <4C4E4457.5000405@gmail.com> <876301cbfz.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <4C5621BA.6020601@gmail.com> <4C56424B.8060007@gmail.com> <7kshq0z8zd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2016 22:57:58 -0500 > > I believe this report is not relevant any more, > eg w32-specific makefiles were removed some time ago. Indeed.