Subject: Re: bug#67249: 30.0.50; `same-frame` equivalent for `display-buffer-alist`

From: martin rudalics <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 10:00:40 +0100

> BTW, I just noticed another way to attack the problem, which is to add
 > a `pop-up-frames` argument which works just like the variable but takes
 > precedence over it, as in the PoC patch below (a real patch would
 > adjust other places where we use that variable, among other things).
 >
 > WDYT?

Then we should probably use 'pop-up-windows' instead of
'inhibit-same-window'.  'display-buffer' resembles a Cervantesque
struggle of consistency with history.

martin