GNU bug report logs - #67196
M-: uses a wrong value of debug-on-error when it is nil.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
Cc: 67196 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#67196: M-: uses a wrong value of debug-on-error when it is nil.
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2023 09:23:42 -0500

> That's a very good idea.  It would need little more than a new C function
> which would bind that variable then call eval.  Maybe move
> eval-expression-debug-on-error into eval.c, too.

Side note: there's recently been several things pointing to the need to
add something like Common Lisp's `handler-bind`.

`handler-bind` would provide a superset of the features that your
new C function would provide.  E.g. we could do something like:

    (defmacro with-debug-on-error (&rest body)
      `(handler-bind ((error #'debugger))
         ,@body))

which would mean that any error signal not caught within BODY itself
would call the debugger (and contrary to `condition-case`, that call is
performed before unwinding the stack, so we'd get the behavior we
expect from the debugger).

> Sorry, I wasn't clear enough.  During those 10 hours, I was under the
> impression that debug-on-error was t, because M-: debug-on-error said so.
> It actually was nil.  That's why I submitted this bug report.

I feel for you.  Personally I had a similar experience at some point but
instead of looking at the value of the var, I actually signaled
an error.

Seeing how I was getting into the debugger, I assumed that
`debug-on-error` was properly set (I had set it manually, so I (thought
I) knew that it was set, which is why I didn't even look at the var, but
apparently that was within a recursive edit that had it let-bound or
something, which is why it was actually unset).

The change you propose wouldn't have helped me directly in that case,
tho I think it probably would have circumvented the problem because the
var presumably wouldn't have been let-bound in the first place :-)

It took me less than 10 hours to figure out one of my many unjustified
assumptions, luckily.


        Stefan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.