From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 24 12:52:11 2010 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2010 16:52:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OchxL-0007oW-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:11 -0400 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OchxJ-0007oR-G0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:09 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:51013) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OchxJ-0007t7-Ne for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:09 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41337 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OchxI-0008PG-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OchxH-0000VJ-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:45434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OchxH-0000V6-9W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 12:52:07 -0400 Received: by wyg36 with SMTP id 36so1295202wyg.0 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:52:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pNZFP0xdiET8rnfkEFN1UpUKyR7AX6BQdMYSMapPXq0=; b=cTxxctTA03xCtkyqv5t7vfD0EjMJwejSNatL2OaG1gX98RIQhwvx77GB8XbpesJJx5 0f5Muz5ihcNU7V+BcO/ER/EdrnwJNFVSn+BYQ6L69fpA83Gaz56IbabckIYrgx2BBXvG 1vbhMQc/ZQoS4ISTGpCP24kkYkmX9f1KbJS7M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=HwbgzDhxvIP2/eoWhnI0ErAbA91DNX8p6TXOCFzkSsFwOlvGFExUuHZKFRiVJf0bpb uuGfSQ2CWGp1OBq+zWepSmGS6k36Y0pUDB1fhn//ocN9DIuTOlY0FNpUbNKI929+OY2P bZrXJrGgpHfZ62ZYnCLothNnQecRFa4SbMo0U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.237.100 with SMTP id x78mr5030470weq.114.1279990325842; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.53.15 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:52:05 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Issues with Windows hibernation From: Esa Peuha To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151743fa10b011bf048c24f89e X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) --00151743fa10b011bf048c24f89e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If Windows XP is hibernated while Emacs 23.2 is running, Emacs gets the event which by default is undefined, so Emacs beeps before hibernation and displays " is undefined" after Windows is resumed; I think should be ignored by default. Also, if the Emacs window was maximized before hibernation, it isn't restored to quite as it was; its size is reduced slightly and it's surrounded by the usual window border. --00151743fa10b011bf048c24f89e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 If Windows XP is hibernated while Emacs 23.2 is running, Emacs gets
the <sleep> event which by default is undefined, so Emacs beeps before
hibernation and displays "<sleep> is undefined" after Windows is
resumed; I think <sleep> should be ignored by default. Also, if the
Emacs window was maximized before hibernation, it isn't restored to
quite as it was; its size is reduced slightly and it's surrounded by
the usual window border.

--00151743fa10b011bf048c24f89e-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jan 31 21:54:19 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2017 02:54:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52725 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYl3q-0006sB-Rk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:54:18 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com ([209.85.214.54]:36891) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYl3p-0006rz-Lj for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:54:17 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id r185so8746788ita.0 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:54:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=wQUlxcEhIiv9g1a8FuF9KODaTFljwZ/2nB8SnxDGFjc=; b=YdZWa3z9fvd2IMbTc9bOHz7GtBcchr2v1aYegfONF+pEkGSNs1zyLgRQI8RLvOSIol kLMOE9dCN/VUN5n/JrE4pR/iMxLqfyQhNMkd2yA0mwUp8E/U1BP2tuZaz1vQEgNeqS5Y 6xbPd8DHqrenJToUfYr0KGUMypnRW9kSdQkNKOfWRYOQ/+Stsb/pIuPn3wkGgtht8nn1 czkif6ChC8lSy+V4Fv5RHnr0jiwPTCe2VV0ftTBimlqu+xyJT3AMmRdIie+tAh2sjUtk 8MdGQRfFbUuCYT2yZAqXPJShS+0jrdw+Y6UGvIkSEBNJsXJ8PildGhHf3FQSzTQkCYVQ +Mxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=wQUlxcEhIiv9g1a8FuF9KODaTFljwZ/2nB8SnxDGFjc=; b=BHKQsuVIbVXcit6xMpIL8a/ukZzRCprYCCDSjSF7IBhBZM1bt53/2g/Bhf0BPl9Wa7 Wlr2ALR1SKBz1f9Q/wkDpKY0RLzfzb5xkWlzCV5HiSgi0GOGvQO4zp5euTmzOqMm2SoR lLXE5SflutdkR7fCYBhSKJaTssoR+U4qO3g1VmAIPdKHFvGJDCHstXodk7yXJHxQHbXy hZkKo2XNh2QqUToSogXDTNckoUpTe/m05XMDdpewofIZN2JuQFeeaG7tM4nVT7/iO6f7 oH1B1YvW7ylpavr+GRArRTKmwX8F5j+2PFaVDwrH0JYPbRoIc73Hc9+3R5tQLOjVvy6k 8Ghw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLpYstvJyhdW2xotRKd701Lh7nhWjkQu11htwY8RA2qz2yDgdGTWnhb4p4GpTqCwg== X-Received: by 10.36.217.150 with SMTP id p144mr860027itg.90.1485917651907; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:54:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j79sm9350590itb.0.2017.01.31.18.54.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 18:54:11 -0800 (PST) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: update bug#6719 title, meta data Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:55:20 -0500 Message-ID: <8737fyr55z.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) severity 6719 minor retitle 6719 [w32] Hibernate sends undefined key & shrinks maximized windows found 6719 23.2 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 01 15:34:11 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2019 19:34:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFNuV-00086L-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:34:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:58778) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFNuS-000868-Qj for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 15:34:09 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFNuO-0007Ei-RS; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:34:07 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Esa Peuha Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:34:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Esa Peuha's message of "Sat, 24 Jul 2010 19:52:05 +0300") Message-ID: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Esa Peuha writes: > If Windows XP is hibernated while Emacs 23.2 is running, Emacs gets > the event which by default is undefined, so Emacs beeps before > hibernation and displays " is undefined" after W [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Esa Peuha writes: > If Windows XP is hibernated while Emacs 23.2 is running, Emacs gets > the event which by default is undefined, so Emacs beeps before > hibernation and displays " is undefined" after Windows is > resumed; I think should be ignored by default. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately didn't get any response at the time.) This seems like a reasonable thing to add to global-map (i.e., ignoring [sleep]), but is it common for Windows to send a [sleep] keystroke to apps before hibernating? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 02 10:53:28 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2019 14:53:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38129 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFg0N-0008AY-UA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:53:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34115) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFg0M-0008AK-0G for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:53:26 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFg0G-0000xm-NR; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:53:20 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4780 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iFg0E-0005bT-SB; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 10:53:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:53:02 +0300 Message-Id: <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:34:04 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 21:34:04 +0200 > Cc: 6719@debbugs.gnu.org > > Esa Peuha writes: > > > If Windows XP is hibernated while Emacs 23.2 is running, Emacs gets > > the event which by default is undefined, so Emacs beeps before > > hibernation and displays " is undefined" after Windows is > > resumed; I think should be ignored by default. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately didn't get any > response at the time.) > > This seems like a reasonable thing to add to global-map (i.e., ignoring > [sleep]), but is it common for Windows to send a [sleep] keystroke to > apps before hibernating? I don't know, FWIW, and couldn't see where we any w32 code to inject that event when the system is about to hibernate. Maybe I'm missing something. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 03 10:26:32 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 14:26:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG23s-0005tg-Bw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 10:26:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:48696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG23r-0005tY-6Q for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 10:26:31 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG23m-0008Qe-VV; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:26:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:26:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:53:02 +0300") Message-ID: <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This seems like a reasonable thing to add to global-map (i.e., ignoring >> [sleep]), but is it common for Windows to send a [sleep] keystroke to >> apps before hibernating? > > I don't know, FWIW, [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This seems like a reasonable thing to add to global-map (i.e., ignoring >> [sleep]), but is it common for Windows to send a [sleep] keystroke to >> apps before hibernating? > > I don't know, FWIW, and couldn't see where we any w32 code to inject > that event when the system is about to hibernate. Maybe I'm missing > something. Is it possible that the OS just sends a [sleep] event to all clients when it's about to hibernate? It would be a pretty simple interface for notifying apps instead of using signals or a message bus... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 03 12:46:38 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 16:46:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40979 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4FQ-0002wZ-Tj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:46:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4FO-0002wH-4R for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:46:35 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4FI-0000nz-IO; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:46:28 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1044 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4FH-000832-Rv; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:46:28 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:46:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:26:26 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:26:26 +0200 > > > I don't know, FWIW, and couldn't see where we any w32 code to inject > > that event when the system is about to hibernate. Maybe I'm missing > > something. > > Is it possible that the OS just sends a [sleep] event to all clients > when it's about to hibernate? Maybe, I just don't know. AFAIK, the message sent in that case is not processed by Emacs to generate a 'sleep' function key, we only generate that when the actual "sleep" key on the keyboard is pressed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 03 13:12:24 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 17:12:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41035 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4eN-0005jh-Tz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:12:24 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:52402) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4eM-0005jX-7S for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:12:22 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4eJ-0001jN-4n; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:12:21 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:12:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:46:10 +0300") Message-ID: <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe, I just don't know. AFAIK, the message sent in that case is not > processed by Emacs to generate a 'sleep' function key, we only > generate that when the actual "sleep" key on the keyboard is [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > Maybe, I just don't know. AFAIK, the message sent in that case is not > processed by Emacs to generate a 'sleep' function key, we only > generate that when the actual "sleep" key on the keyboard is pressed. On GNU/Linux, it's easy enough to inject events into the event queue of a process that's indistinguishable from an actual keyboard event, so I was assuming that Windows also had such a thing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Oct 03 13:31:22 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2019 17:31:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41071 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4wh-00015c-Jc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:31:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4wf-0000zh-TN for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:31:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49349) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4wa-0005mB-Ov; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:31:12 -0400 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3779 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iG4wa-0004Mg-9Q; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 13:31:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 20:30:59 +0300 Message-Id: <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-reply-to: <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:12:18 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 19:12:18 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Maybe, I just don't know. AFAIK, the message sent in that case is not > > processed by Emacs to generate a 'sleep' function key, we only > > generate that when the actual "sleep" key on the keyboard is pressed. > > On GNU/Linux, it's easy enough to inject events into the event queue of > a process that's indistinguishable from an actual keyboard event, so I > was assuming that Windows also had such a thing. It does. It's just that I don't see that particular message handled anywhere in our sources which handle various Windows messages, so I wonder how did the OP get the 'sleep' function key in the first place. Maybe he just pressed the Sleep key... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 06 23:30:59 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 03:31:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJjf-00020L-JE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:30:59 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:54776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJje-0001z0-It for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 23:30:58 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHJjb-000568-8p; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:30:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation In-Reply-To: <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 03 Oct 2019 20:30:59 +0300") References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:30:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It does. It's just that I don't see that particular message handled > anywhere in our sources which handle various Windows messages, so I > wonder how did the OP get the 'sleep' function key in the [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: > It does. It's just that I don't see that particular message handled > anywhere in our sources which handle various Windows messages, so I > wonder how did the OP get the 'sleep' function key in the first place. > Maybe he just pressed the Sleep key... It's possible. Does anybody here have access to a Windows laptop that goes to sleep when you close the lid? Could you try to do that and see whether Emacs gets a [sleep] event that it then complains about? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 07 01:05:06 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 05:05:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47231 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHLCk-0005MH-48 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:05:06 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:49450) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHLCf-0005LZ-W5 for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:05:04 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97A9160063 for <6719@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:04:55 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1570424695; bh=aq0YY2Y1olXq3eyDK2t6Vf3zSnsUc5x8jfDJiVGsr0g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=P+ab6WOqywDFWMywjWiP/mPLQzO3gjYZ5Zgi6JRneRhmJ5kOm1titNNhPZUakRRR4 8qhp1MU5pNzF/9DhdxyvsBlu2FPspjRhES+cPkKeG7Ou6zHor6gPCKoYOfe4qC9ICK q3ZlVe3GzG+6o8Bmk2cTVmJKsbc/GEDooFpH7mgtchaWnYnGX2COQIGhVDGqgEmN9y z1ulCgc2kr4hvsGCFV2I3+R9tEhCXrL6H2Ui9ihmsxL49pSXbBb+tm0BdRySHDOImL rAeSHNxZwjrlQ6sZdozjmMS3ZV3w1nSwlrTlkyyAitKmYJ4jaEmnEworAurBSPLCrj ElYMFmGn1N52g== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 46mpLt4dctz6tmD; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:04:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomas Nordin To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation In-Reply-To: <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:04:54 +0200 Message-ID: <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> It does. It's just that I don't see that particular message handled >> anywhere in our sources which handle various Windows messages, so I >> wonder how did the OP get the 'sleep' function key in the first place. >> Maybe he just pressed the Sleep key... > > It's possible. > > Does anybody here have access to a Windows laptop that goes to sleep > when you close the lid? Could you try to do that and see whether Emacs > gets a [sleep] event that it then complains about? I do at work, what must I do? What should I inspect when coming back from sleep? Best regards -- Tomas > > -- > (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) > bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 07 01:06:28 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 05:06:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHLE4-0005OS-K6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:06:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHLE1-0005OJ-NB for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 01:06:27 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHLDy-00066Y-1v; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:06:24 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Tomas Nordin Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:06:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (Tomas Nordin's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:04:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Tomas Nordin writes: > I do at work, what must I do? What should I inspect when coming back > from sleep? The bug report states that Emacs says Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Tomas Nordin writes: > I do at work, what must I do? What should I inspect when coming back > from sleep? The bug report states that Emacs says " is undefined" when the lid is opened (and Windows has resumed from sleep). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 07 04:57:42 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 08:57:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHOpq-0000NX-4z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:57:42 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:39718) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHOpl-0000NG-29 for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 04:57:40 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CBD160061 for <6719@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:57:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1570438649; bh=4U1KCchleAyIEgKoxTaj9Csku7l5sRixP0DzzBXiZho=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=VvE9J7cytNTZrpjnU93ynZzC2cHkZBHJhy1H7K+ocqmlINK0BPuEo364qEMKAkrlY gfMTmbTIQ2R/29QaEoQQI9ytSf1lTFBLQMITYf58pv0Dwr3MgIs5918pMRmk+NYUJo DZWqYsAMOGkRhtVeV2KUerWqkG+xOGcuIdktnwLUwZ5pK1fOr+BJzeZNVmatGZk6nL jSKvlQPkM2S/AwSvxv+mI0r0oV/hn2lOSyD9nkGf/6tPt4S2e259a9PbfIbYWZWFFa wO0Y3uaGtzNuaXVvyTGNykgS+rrVSp8oy1AhSG0M7JQwwTmeY0LZj8kgkKueZEDKS2 VcqPX91iKbdMw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 46mvWC6X03z6tmM; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 10:57:27 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:57:27 +0200 From: Tomas Nordin To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation In-Reply-To: <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> Message-ID: <3f56f7667519223ed154f88e27ac0074@posteo.net> X-Sender: tomasn@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) On 07.10.2019 07:06, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Tomas Nordin writes: > >> I do at work, what must I do? What should I inspect when coming back >> from sleep? > > The bug report states that Emacs says > > " is undefined" > > when the lid is opened (and Windows has resumed from sleep). Had my normal Emacs running and started one emacs -Q. Closed the lid for a while to go to sleep. When back I could not see anything about sleep in the instances. I checked the messages (`view-echo-area-messages`). Here is some info from the emacs -Q instance: In GNU Emacs 26.2 (build 1, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2019-04-13 built on CIRROCUMULUS Repository revision: fd1b34bfba8f3f6298df47c8e10b61530426f749 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.17134 Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Quit Configured using: 'configure --without-dbus --host=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=-O2 -static -g3'' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 07 08:13:14 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2019 12:13:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47445 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHRt4-00076M-7X for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:13:14 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com ([209.85.166.49]:41293) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHRt2-00076A-FL for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:13:12 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id n26so27866430ioj.8 for <6719@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:13:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=z9hPDwGH82MeG2TVjuCUWR5CDyM2853fZ+gJ8CAeKEg=; b=jKombZunIgKuyxB5ImQpZdqUgIrjuR9vEOuZodwO0gz+LjTeHlqPmf7jSQvfMEPYo1 PQV3uMl925lBdA7N7qUSt1zKHzsPdT3lESNz0KM2lfxM01pQb6kIcw81LwgGVw2ChcAv Fxl6Lwasb3jI+Cr3+nQsgMMa/iWN7Sdu2Fi5dwNBx5YEDTAoCNwReqwnYwXv5znDBSqh hLB+Ju0rutD7UhbUqiWQe8MEK5cTdxHZJTeypbWqLVqLhtBSgrHQTGAc3aUE/MksSSp1 lPkl0vQxnuxbHG23lUN8RoO3Fj//+BObWjQ9CcnKoIqDhhrX19DhhwN8X4a8VLuYDPI7 ZE7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=z9hPDwGH82MeG2TVjuCUWR5CDyM2853fZ+gJ8CAeKEg=; b=VJIRJ6DtAs5n+hjsc+lw+/fKUw2ubjGB3CaNJEd2NZfWSE3WLHJCDpkRMYYpB2W9KH gcYB8q4WUc9sbaHNOQ9SrZ9PyUiEXLC7niMOmqRk3UfdOYkgU73XeP/3UIsnjkeW5pKp kr4EUjXWbsfpsWLFVZEIb172Uw7otwM9lzftPAcOS8hnn458WjAUZr4nKW5bfqzhSTGf j2D9lmzECf0F0UwLck6x5inoSohIbHvZZlodEdvIWguT87m0spOAT2xbTG1lKgzqmJJc MIgC3qeCzRpHeieLYJVZhEW3XjKnBV0aGLVHYRbwwFcYeyVbWDqI40KAraO5du6bnF/0 7rfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKJYO6uvGnSzHFTUJhsIMsWXvSAPnYZeb+l5eUxVZ7/fl8XJuM Bt77S4HyGe6tSmUDArDfWOYgIoMr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx6PR195h20ZC6C+Axyp8pzwTfnWSPOnr/ONySzghwTksM4r/zR5o91NjaG9p6zqynGNxGadw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:d789:: with SMTP id d9mr24888365iln.144.1570450386710; Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:13:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v70sm7327714ilk.58.2019.10.07.05.13.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 07 Oct 2019 05:13:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Noam Postavsky To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 08:13:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 07:06:21 +0200") Message-ID: <875zl092jz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: Tomas Nordin , esa.peuha@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > The bug report states that Emacs says > > " is undefined" > > when the lid is opened (and Windows has resumed from sleep). The OP says nothing about a lid. (And I wouldn't expect opening a lid to wake up from hibernate, though maybe it's possible to configure things that way) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 08 12:39:52 2019 Received: (at 6719) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 16:39:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51356 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWe-00073Z-Ba for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:39:52 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39710) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWc-00073P-C8 for 6719@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:39:51 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWY-0007Ty-RU; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:39:49 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Tomas Nordin Subject: Re: bug#6719: Issues with Windows hibernation References: <87zhikw98z.fsf@gnus.org> <83pnjf8ai9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r23tucq5.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8yx7p65.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnjdg3d9.fsf@gnus.org> <83eezt7n3g.fsf@gnu.org> <87k19hb5ap.fsf@gnus.org> <871rvpdu2x.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87ftk587qq.fsf@gnus.org> <3f56f7667519223ed154f88e27ac0074@posteo.net> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:39:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <3f56f7667519223ed154f88e27ac0074@posteo.net> (Tomas Nordin's message of "Mon, 07 Oct 2019 10:57:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87imozyywd.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Tomas Nordin writes: > Had my normal Emacs running and started one emacs -Q. Closed the lid > for a while to go to sleep. When back I > could not see anything about sleep in the instances. I checked the > messages (`view- [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 6719 Cc: esa.peuha@gmail.com, 6719@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Tomas Nordin writes: > Had my normal Emacs running and started one emacs -Q. Closed the lid > for a while to go to sleep. When back I > could not see anything about sleep in the instances. I checked the > messages (`view-echo-area-messages`). Thanks for checking. Since this problem seems unreproducible, perhaps it was just something Windows did in one particular old version? So I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 08 12:40:04 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2019 16:40:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51360 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWp-00074W-N5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:40:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:39730) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWo-000745-MS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:40:03 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHsWm-0007U7-1Q for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:40:02 +0200 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 18:39:59 +0200 Message-Id: <87h84jyyw0.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #6719 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 6719 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 6719 quit From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:42:13 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 12:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator