GNU bug report logs - #66993
[PATCH] project.el: avoid asking user about project-list-file lock

Previous Next

Full log

Message #110 received at 66993 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
Cc: dmitry <at> gutov.dev, 66993 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66993: [PATCH] project.el: avoid asking user about
 project-list-file lock
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 21:46:53 +0200

> From: Spencer Baugh <sbaugh <at> janestreet.com>
> Cc: dmitry <at> gutov.dev,  66993 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 13:01:09 -0500
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> > Please show the result of this change on what Emacs prints in batch
> > mode when this error is signaled.
> 
> Before:
> 
> $ ./src/emacs -Q --batch --eval '(write-region "foo" nil "~/file")'
> /home/sbaugh/file locked by sbaugh <at> igm-qw... (pid 3781848): (s, q, p, ?)? 
> 
> Error: error ("Cannot resolve lock conflict in batch mode")
>   mapbacktrace(#f(compiled-function (evald func args flags) #<bytecode 0x957865a77aef0ee>))
>   debug-early-backtrace()
>   debug-early(error (error "Cannot resolve lock conflict in batch mode"))
>   signal(error ("Cannot resolve lock conflict in batch mode"))
>   error("Cannot resolve lock conflict in batch mode")
>   ask-user-about-lock("/home/sbaugh/file" "sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)")
>   write-region("foo" nil "~/file")
>   eval((write-region "foo" nil "~/file") t)
>   command-line-1(("--eval" "(write-region \"foo\" nil \"~/file\")"))
>   command-line()
>   normal-top-level()
> Cannot resolve lock conflict in batch mode
> 
> 
> After:
> 
> $ ./src/emacs -Q --batch --eval '(write-region "foo" nil "~/file")'
> /home/sbaugh/file locked by sbaugh <at> igm-qw... (pid 3781848): (s, q, p, ?)? 
> 
> Error: file-locked ("/home/sbaugh/file" "sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)")
>   mapbacktrace(#f(compiled-function (evald func args flags) #<bytecode 0x179d0e5a77aef0e7>))
>   debug-early-backtrace()
>   debug-early(error (file-locked "/home/sbaugh/file" "sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)"))
>   signal(file-locked ("/home/sbaugh/file" "sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)"))
>   ask-user-about-lock("/home/sbaugh/file" "sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)")
>   write-region("foo" nil "~/file")
>   eval((write-region "foo" nil "~/file") t)
>   command-line-1(("--eval" "(write-region \"foo\" nil \"~/file\")"))
>   command-line()
>   normal-top-level()
> /home/sbaugh/file: sbaugh <at> igm-qws-u22796a (pid 3781848)

Thanks, that's what I thought: this loses information.  The "Cannot
resolve lock conflict in batch mode" part is important, since it
explains the "file-locked" part.  So please include the missing text
in the list passed to 'signal' as its DATA argument, so as not to lose
this explanation.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.