GNU bug report logs - #66924
[PATCH] gnu: emacs-evil-anzu: Update to 0.03-0.d1e98ee.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 22:21:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Rostislav Svoboda <rostislav.svoboda <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>, 66924 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Andrew Tropin <andrew <at> trop.in>
Subject: [bug#66924] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-evil-anzu: Update to 0.03-0.d1e98ee.
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2023 07:33:10 +0100
Am Samstag, dem 04.11.2023 um 01:14 +0100 schrieb Rostislav Svoboda:
> > The home-page update should be reflected in the ChangeLog rather
> > than explained in prose.
> 
> ???
> What do you exactly mean by "reflected"? I'm not trying to explain or
> reflect anything. I wrote this little note there so that people know
> that I didn't change the repo URL by mistake.
IOW you explained it :)

> I looked at the changes between 0.03 and d1e98ee - seem legit to me,
> no backdoors or anything of that sort. The 0.03 is almost 9 years
> old, the d1e98ee has been on melpa since March 2023 and it looks like
> the changes are really needed, 'cause some other thing (doom emacs),
> is throwing me an error when the 0.03 is used.
> 
> > You might also want to add a comment to the file as to why we're
> > checking out a commit.
> 
> ???
> There's nothing else to check out. And that wouldn't be a meaningful
> comment.
Look at other Emacs packages that have not had a long release.  They
carry a comment like ";; No release since DATE."

Cheers





This bug report was last modified 1 year and 254 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.