Subject: bug#6691: 23.2; Eshell and ^M

From: Eli Zaretskii <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:58:55 +0300

> From: Leo <[email-masked]>
> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:48:32 +0800
> Cc: [email-masked], John Wiegley <[email-masked]>,
> 	Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
> 
> BTW, why process coding system for input and output are set to
> utf-8-unix?

I'm not entirely sure (my failing memory is ... well, failing), but I
think that's because guessing the EOL format in process output is
unreliable (due to partial reads) and can cause trouble.  Again, don't
take this for granted; perhaps someone else can confirm or refute.