Subject: Re: bug#6691: 23.2; Eshell and ^M (PATCH attached)

From: John Wiegley <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:35:52 -0500

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]> writes:

> If this patch leads to a significant slow-down, then it can't be applied,
> and the reporter should try to determine when the variable is mis-updated, I
> guess?

I would think so, yes.  I don't believe that I put it in for no reason. :)

John