GNU bug report logs - #66801
[PATCH] mix-build-system: draft 1

Previous Next

Full log

Message #329 received at 66801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>
To: Pierre-Henry Fröhring <contact <at> phfrohring.com>
Cc: 66801 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] gnu: Add elixir-inch-ex.
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2023 16:35:16 +0100

Am Freitag, dem 08.12.2023 um 16:03 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Henry
Fröhring:
> From: Pierre-Henry Fröhring <phfrohring <at> deeplinks.com>
> 
> * gnu/packages/elixir-xyz.scm (elixir-inch-ex): New variable.
> 
> Change-Id: I6e98424528a0264a2587d28fcf065fa74eff0f1a
> ---
>  gnu/packages/elixir-xyz.scm | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/elixir-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/elixir-
> xyz.scm
> index 984649de4..12aee0d78 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/elixir-xyz.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/elixir-xyz.scm
> @@ -144,6 +144,29 @@ (define-public elixir-bunt
>      (home-page "https://hexdocs.pm/bunt/")
>      (license license:expat)))
>  
> +(define-public elixir-inch-ex
> +  (package
> +    (name "elixir-inch-ex")
> +    (version "2.0.0")
> +    (source
> +     (origin
> +       (method url-fetch)
> +       (uri (hexpm-uri name version))
> +       (sha256
> +        (base32
> "1a4rjcy3hn5pc40si1d1y7qg0b0mnxx6pw825la67ky8r9gfrl4n"))))
> +    (build-system mix-build-system)
> +    (arguments
> +     (list
> +      #:tests? #f))
> +    (propagated-inputs (list elixir-bunt elixir-jason))
> +    (synopsis
> +     "Offers a Mix task for suggestions on enhancing your inline
> documentation")
Perhaps shorten to "Suggest enhancements for inline documentation".
> +    (description
> +     "This package provides a Mix task that gives you hints where to
> improve your
> +inline docs.")
> +    (home-page "https://hex.pm/packages/inch_ex")
> +    (license license:expat)))
> +
>  ;;;
>  ;;; Avoid adding new packages to the end of this file. To reduce the
> chances
>  ;;; of a merge conflict, place them above by existing packages with
> similar
I see this line quite often now.  Perhaps you should at least sort your
new packages alphabetically so that it doesn't *always* show up?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.