GNU bug report logs - #66795
29.1; debbugs hashcash behavior discrepancy

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>

Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 14:29:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 29.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 66795 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 66795 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, mirai <at> makinata.eu
Subject: Re: bug#66795: 29.1; debbugs hashcash behavior discrepancy
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:01:18 -0800
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> writes:

> Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
>>> It's strange that the value of `message-generate-hashcash' is ignored
>>> when debbugs is used. This is undesired behavior since it results in
>>> redundant or unused X-Hashcash headers when I edit the addresses in the
>>> Cc or To lines.
>>
>> I'm not sure where debbugs comes into it -- Gnus will generate hashcash
>> headers for any reply, during message setup. You don't see anything in
>> "C-x m" because there's nothing in the To or Cc headers yet. But "S w"
>> in a regular Gnus summary buffer will also generate the headers.
>
> I don't know where we are now. Is it an error? Is it an error triggered
> only in debbugs? Or isn't it an error at all?

I don't know! I installed hashcash and turned it on, and couldn't see
any difference in behavior between replies from debbugs summary buffers
and regular Gnus summary buffers.




This bug report was last modified 191 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.