GNU bug report logs -
#66776
SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types
Previous Next
Full log
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
I've mean meaning to use 'test-error' in test suites, but as a comment
in its source says, it's currently incomplete:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
;; TODO: decide how to specify expected error types for Guile.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
So, for example, this should fail but passes:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
(test-begin "test")
(test-error "testing" 'bad (throw 'oops))
(test-end "test")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
'test-error' report success for any type of exception, which means its 2nd
argument is currently unused.
It'd also be nice if as its second argument it could accept non only a
error symbol key, but an exception type *or* an exception predicate,
e.g.:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(use-modules (ice-9 exceptions) (srfi srfi-64))
(define-exception-type &my-exception
&exception ;parent
make-my-exception ;constructor
my-exception?) ;predicate
(test-begin "test-error exception types")
;; Passes, but should fail.
(test-error "&my-exception raised"
&my-exception
(raise-exception (make-error)))
;; OR
;; Unimplemented, but passes also.
(test-error "&my-exception raised"
my-exception?
(raise-exception (make-error)))
(test-begin "test-error exception types")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
There is a more modern implementation of SRFI-64 out there for Guile
which may provide clues or be used wholesale, though I haven't tried it:
<https://codeberg.org/taylan/scheme-srfis/src/branch/master/srfi/64>.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 211 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.