From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:39 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#66776 <66776@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#66776 <66776@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types Reply-To: bug#66776 <66776@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:03:39 +0000 retitle 66776 SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types reassign 66776 guile submitter 66776 Maxim Cournoyer severity 66776 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 27 14:41:25 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Oct 2023 18:41:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37198 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwRls-0000ii-PK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:41:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:33676) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwRlq-0000iS-AT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:41:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwRlF-0008NZ-1i for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:40:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qwRlB-0001wX-CR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:40:43 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-66cfef11a25so15748006d6.3 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:40:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698432039; x=1699036839; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mJIjBfOJakCRj8Rb6+3a/mm8sIF+zRHWSR3O3GrAsqY=; b=ffhAcTzDyvmBvoIntrZcDk7aCTYh5OGIj9/+FRHjr/dv5aRAmfqEusYWAKz+irimKe AZpus6uOitOD2H7RZLbxPAeW0nWqJiDU934qx9xCjWSZ8RFp4+/YMHGqY9U5hDoA2bSn MpYyQKz2nelHRrQlW/bpEPSBK4yBZMH4NeRwnhpkqtz8JXW6874OeegwMTp8O1jpEOEJ tqlriKlc5yg/Pbfm0WjAgen596rp0bGpKLw2mqe7DGM3bws/PZJlZZYBPnKDotfxuVqG XxvBvGphlqDu24fxIVlegW70OtSmCTh9IFTypnhG+22LHNeugsnUvZaPpwdh8iXQxFwJ 88YA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698432039; x=1699036839; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mJIjBfOJakCRj8Rb6+3a/mm8sIF+zRHWSR3O3GrAsqY=; b=j+QfNOquktgA/5fdbhkKrKXAIofpG8IR6hqzmBV/VF2+3JHBsTbQyYko5gOBFnc56y knS4fQFT/LEe53A6U7IKdhT5k76aKbg2e6JxMzwmIW5bgw1C2gZvfk0q1iIVGi9onhqv MYtyLDQqW90kpOEKNIXToexXdzkqVh2PYzMd54BI2LLY0pu0iE0+5PmmjxJDQnxa8C2o 2u+6Mb+/hmhj0DTNyik7YSyW+6Lbfj5d8WeJCrMQXXStsb+BZf+vCqbwnvvRvmXdz8Gw PBYwNEmcvHXFWxTEh7Tu4wM2SQZTTCQsdOaSheaQ5oTO93BuUqGlw5nmqCFShSxnIGAR RMaQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxNPwo4oi9PsR1z2I9M7sjy2sDxzpE3TYGOyXjca8bFLaSLLGZL cZkf/ZdUkqi+SIibKleGP87YZIQZlgs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEF7WTr4dvVuknpcuvtFPvHgk0LY/2s8we/taC9ZBunAXgu2hGcqT4G3twK1RvPUFvUGeS/kQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:1306:b0:66d:33c8:b83e with SMTP id pn6-20020a056214130600b0066d33c8b83emr4836231qvb.26.1698432039270; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:40:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-159-214.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.159.214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s3-20020ad44b23000000b0063c71b62239sm842124qvw.42.2023.10.27.11.40.38 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:40:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: bug-guile Subject: SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:40:31 -0400 Message-ID: <878r7nvrhc.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d; envelope-from=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Hello, I've mean meaning to use 'test-error' in test suites, but as a comment in its source says, it's currently incomplete: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ;; TODO: decide how to specify expected error types for Guile. --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- So, for example, this should fail but passes: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) (test-begin "test") (test-error "testing" 'bad (throw 'oops)) (test-end "test") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- 'test-error' report success for any type of exception, which means its 2nd argument is currently unused. It'd also be nice if as its second argument it could accept non only a error symbol key, but an exception type *or* an exception predicate, e.g.: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (use-modules (ice-9 exceptions) (srfi srfi-64)) (define-exception-type &my-exception &exception ;parent make-my-exception ;constructor my-exception?) ;predicate (test-begin "test-error exception types") ;; Passes, but should fail. (test-error "&my-exception raised" &my-exception (raise-exception (make-error))) ;; OR ;; Unimplemented, but passes also. (test-error "&my-exception raised" my-exception? (raise-exception (make-error))) (test-begin "test-error exception types") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- There is a more modern implementation of SRFI-64 out there for Guile which may provide clues or be used wholesale, though I haven't tried it: . -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 28 14:11:16 2023 Received: (at 66776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2023 18:11:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39518 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwnmG-0004mM-5S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 14:11:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]:42408) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qwnmC-0004m8-Sq for 66776@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 14:11:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40806e4106dso18158785e9.1 for <66776@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:10:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698516634; x=1699121434; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kcAwpxYqPHNXWWf5M86NsQqMjcSrJd8ZrmoZFisspSs=; b=KgCSMoBjeuTSdF6OQ4nyFkJLStwriEbHq5V1LburavGbW8Ae+rIA9PxxJuKPqG9q9M 6wNYAOu90wCG+5zTX9s6EYcjipAXuPVdjB2aAFSFRjew0/st29ImVLeKYtScVSSX4/ig pk9O1x9CQAYEvHbGurQgm+4VrWxLt8zYC5omfWwnf5MyBWUHRx1alG3/GuidKKZuD0Xa S37qo3f3XJZbfm/9QvelCaT/RM+Pq4e6iEkKguwvUpL27Z9bBGYGH2SVKW0wk45A16sQ Fcw6qklmZ7X49wWQVltlWVWtC7CQLJRHk0aSIuOpt1z2k6h/Oh5V9q6arTt8CgVj1hAy ItpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698516634; x=1699121434; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kcAwpxYqPHNXWWf5M86NsQqMjcSrJd8ZrmoZFisspSs=; b=HYx+SWHorHmWVhlWVDpesVPcxK/0j1gVhjuBdl236L57XXgpTxohxH8MEerpPsgr57 7kygeBUtbTSszfJSo48mC1t0WsTO9l/mxi8/YVhqO+MhX3k9grC3k9mCtd8KJp/Cc7Pg 70bDXHVIKlI9+AlwQpvt9lW4rzLHXRdyr5ZuLsJs+gPH9viHtF2Esl14NzjFpI6U1Xm7 KjtbSD4Z0Krf0a+8ZzkkECnkkBrgMswW0+Dk0vZSSBA0f5LbHdMndn52niIwG1RSIyz7 IenlagcCZnN5VLJhui81r36AVhG7++Ap4nsFP+TPG/QwFumF/FA4msUm8KNbat9yhpDO zUnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwAK89zf8wiSQi5G8V2qS6ojQ7JsF4Q5K0CPrtcrtZsZXjxEjoQ kBLkH2pPdZ4nhpKfpR0n97w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHD6fX7kF+DCcGWcF0hC0cHjCACKZLtVry1Ad4SM8bzxFp7ki266p29gRyCRMjhmlGeg+hElw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:35c9:b0:401:c8b9:4b86 with SMTP id r9-20020a05600c35c900b00401c8b94b86mr6756412wmq.9.1698516634383; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.20] (ip-109-090-125-150.um36.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [109.90.125.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11-20020adfffcb000000b003258934a4bcsm4339792wrs.42.2023.10.28.11.10.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Oct 2023 11:10:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39291d90-04d8-4b2f-89db-b059ebc5733f@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 20:10:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#66776: SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types To: Maxim Cournoyer , 66776@debbugs.gnu.org References: <878r7nvrhc.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Taylan Kammer In-Reply-To: <878r7nvrhc.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66776 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 27.10.2023 20:40, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > There is a more modern implementation of SRFI-64 out there for Guile > which may provide clues or be used wholesale, though I haven't tried it: > . > FYI, this is how I check whether a caught error matches the 'type': (define (error-matches? error type) (cond ((eq? type #t) #t) ((condition-type? type) (and (condition? error) (condition-has-type? error type))) ((procedure? type) (type error)) (else (let ((runner (test-runner-get))) ((%test-runner-on-bad-error-type runner) runner type error)) #f))) Defined on Line 336 in execution.body.scm: https://codeberg.org/taylan/scheme-srfis/src/branch/master/srfi/64/execution.body.scm#L336 In summary, other than #t to match anything, 'type' can be: - A SRFI 35 condition-type object - A procedure, which will be called as a predicate on the error The predicate case should cover the Guile and R6RS exception systems, which both simply use predicates to detect condition/exception type from what I can tell: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Exception-Objects.html https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/rnrs-conditions.html -- Taylan P.S.: The warning on Codeberg re. invisible Unicode characters is from using ^L to delineate file sections for navigation with Emacs. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Dec 11 23:45:48 2023 Received: (at 66776) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2023 04:45:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55105 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCueS-0001II-29 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:45:48 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]:57849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCueN-0001I3-7j for 66776@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:45:46 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4259cd18f85so30798151cf.3 for <66776@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702356322; x=1702961122; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=x2vlHzuvJ+eia9TFRvzh7yf6R6c/wg1xd0JlJx5lPYs=; b=RoOn+Ftc6YJBi+bb9vW582zo3/ILNhkUOLNlkw9NVQzLxl0IW4SRLJ9nRrBPY1Yr2I AXZtiRjHg56j+7873OBRmbJKS01BK15vVjWfAK4ya1X6X5LUaX9gxfLaiyeaDiC9SKD7 LW4oPA7J8BtilWk3nGHCpjudDGvG3ohoiDOStMY6qYktLiIqAn2Qf2SHzfS3vwz4sFTc ZzNWXBIAErbagLJ7zGYrFtKlYn4CfHHEgn76/quyf74k6oJ6yYgn/LXC47irtnBHvH5l iBrXPre4YWPuAF68moktq2BUJQEKrMSnC/gCNOcxDJM/QMXsmJ8EABFtUKnSwhP/KGxp qIGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702356322; x=1702961122; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=x2vlHzuvJ+eia9TFRvzh7yf6R6c/wg1xd0JlJx5lPYs=; b=grjjcT3Q7p4eTXYJeGaWKxuQP1pj2JMyv2gQOdg2h4nKphibMpybv5I5nWCZpOdrbO M7NYyGjpdL6DLcEWeg4WQ6tlbIBkEsrmNZUGRimNUApBns4wj1uw2fg1fVrpXNtMJCt6 Dr/o8EQpZYEwuPyYfZvCYVhKMVzcjoXLqdvZhZNh5lu0wpXSbTGdKKAHWvYjoevFlrjQ wJe46Qtvp9lLnF7ZBuOOFOfVmGEsdnF3Bm8/logEIvGOS0K7HQUltpJEx1HZEJ6nFp7E 0IwNKIsnF25tx8r7hSnsOPTTd5XsuJkHCI7kvTRLwyRy/q/v7FwoICyzbHng+VweCMg6 xncA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw2eEEsJsXeLwGstcdl/cnuqw5smX5E+1TKpFAbUdoVu3i44U+u rg4b5536dAydPsJzhWbbQmEwycT8ZQw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG2iFbRw9Rc1ysXssK4IowSK+41F1vgr6zdiasSY0NjK9DkSVq7DRfCB5/Q9IuwsDshUL/J6w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:2d6:b0:417:9c63:391c with SMTP id a22-20020a05622a02d600b004179c63391cmr7183034qtx.52.1702356321778; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from hurd (dsl-157-186.b2b2c.ca. [66.158.157.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z26-20020ac8455a000000b0042387bd254bsm3781333qtn.9.2023.12.11.20.45.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:21 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Taylan Kammer Subject: Re: bug#66776: SRFI-64 test-error doesn't match error types In-Reply-To: <39291d90-04d8-4b2f-89db-b059ebc5733f@gmail.com> (Taylan Kammer's message of "Sat, 28 Oct 2023 20:10:32 +0200") References: <878r7nvrhc.fsf@gmail.com> <39291d90-04d8-4b2f-89db-b059ebc5733f@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:45:20 -0500 Message-ID: <878r60c9lr.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66776 Cc: 66776@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Taylan, Taylan Kammer writes: > On 27.10.2023 20:40, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> >> There is a more modern implementation of SRFI-64 out there for Guile >> which may provide clues or be used wholesale, though I haven't tried it: >> . >> > > FYI, this is how I check whether a caught error matches the 'type': > > (define (error-matches? error type) > (cond > ((eq? type #t) > #t) > ((condition-type? type) > (and (condition? error) (condition-has-type? error type))) > ((procedure? type) > (type error)) > (else > (let ((runner (test-runner-get))) > ((%test-runner-on-bad-error-type runner) runner type error)) > #f))) > > Defined on Line 336 in execution.body.scm: > > https://codeberg.org/taylan/scheme-srfis/src/branch/master/srfi/64/execution.body.scm#L336 > > In summary, other than #t to match anything, 'type' can be: > > - A SRFI 35 condition-type object > > - A procedure, which will be called as a predicate on the error > > The predicate case should cover the Guile and R6RS exception systems, > which both simply use predicates to detect condition/exception type > from what I can tell: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Exception-Objects.html > > https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/rnrs-conditions.html I've tried your SRFI 64 R7RS implementation, and it passes my earlier tests: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) scheme@(guile-user)> (test-begin "test") (test-error "testing" 'bad (throw 'oops)) (test-end "test") Writing log file: test.srfi64.log Test suite begin: test $1 = ("test") WARNING: unknown error type predicate: bad error was: #<&compound-exception components: (#<&error> #<&irritants irritants: ()> #<&exception-with-kind-and-args kind: oops args: ()>)> [FAIL] test: testing #f:2: (throw (quote oops)) Expected error: bad Raised error: #<&compound-exception components: (#<&error> #<&irritants irritants: ()> #<&exception-with-kind-and-args kind: oops args: ()>)> Test suite end: test Passes: 0 Expected failures: 0 Failures: 1 Unexpected passes: 0 Skipped tests: 0 Wrote log file: test.srfi64.log scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (ice-9 exceptions) (srfi srfi-64)) (define-exception-type &my-exception &exception ;parent make-my-exception ;constructor my-exception?) ;predicate (test-begin "test-error exception types") ;; Passes, but should fail. (test-error "&my-exception raised" &my-exception (raise-exception (make-error))) ;; OR ;; Unimplemented, but passes also. (test-error "&my-exception raised" my-exception? (raise-exception (make-error))) (test-begin "test-error exception types") Writing log file: test.srfi64.log Test suite begin: test-error exception types $2 = ("test-error exception types") [FAIL] test-error exception types: &my-exception raised #f:14: (raise-exception (make-error)) Expected error: # Raised error: #<&error> [FAIL] test-error exception types: &my-exception raised #f:21: (raise-exception (make-error)) Expected error: # Raised error: #<&error> $3 = ("test-error exception types" "test-error exception types") --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I'll send the patch upgrading our SRFI 64 implementation to it soon. -- Thanks, Maxim From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 13 11:50:03 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Sep 2024 15:50:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44081 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sp8Yc-0007FK-O5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:50:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:42451) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sp8Ya-0007EM-MU for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:50:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-718d91eef2eso1518081b3a.1 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:49:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1726242525; x=1726847325; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=subject:from:to:message-id:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5EVIuamb8nULUMnnblYPXYoYEY+9O7AIBXP/YkTDdp4=; b=WsJgQhbmtQzc+Lr0Q5t6j2AcXFPAN+ijkv9Yd1MawJpzHSjk3JBydh1mUtar6qd0jF F9um0L0F2qIfRxSk31Jas2FvJSRqWgpAFnvUuqg61G03isJuZI9q+e4F5mOCjZFd+hEd 28p/vbnhUoEjqPUEqyd5CvUoepKVekTkEMawBxBGlh44Cc8/VBvRerzI39SY0Es+5nGt R8qjUHrpac54/2A65VHgizNexItZ3vCHGzNIQX74PSVXiq2OGWFdxR9CTHD5qlFpTAoa dZX86bbYW4YBoU4vuPaRl4zy86eU8XLyeXhJPHnj1hQC2DTI70Ss4rkQuAVghUo3hcTV wKLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726242525; x=1726847325; h=subject:from:to:message-id:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5EVIuamb8nULUMnnblYPXYoYEY+9O7AIBXP/YkTDdp4=; b=MypqDe6SMXkO7AOVeH0AcRG6Kwm9ykC42J7vxN9xPWxamqSeEX2aZin1Kw4qCLwI+W x8JiLbmdhGLtY6UtXW3AsIWtYl04sg1yHWGm1KRMp3GrHZSDDzZSYad43u+u0eYBR7Ms I2ZgbifgM3tc5mydfwikxjWgsiNxBa90xFVvBPHmm0wuC6L8Qxq+/V5dcO7CXlQRnVPP sqWwbqQIc+I7r6IuLdpVZhGMgOXU3+Ywpxk75L8kZRLuuZSzzqTsSxgSd3xD5KmTxqBd 4Yc2fpivJKU2W6no3EHQz19wlUPfbUX3r86+L2jf9XOPU4ZjZ/XKEzk3T7H5GsDK6v0b 1Bfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxMEZXCy9i/CZWdDz4XymXEPQu38e9Fbr4yd/ttFgUh2u/iJIns N8Q/zaNr7CuKZfN9QBbbnJHotVTNagtk9HgyhziFKA145RxXdkOAvAVLpcoj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+6cEUlSJe06VWqyd6YBsaXvMXyi4SstLrd5e1lwnMFwhVfgFoJPVUfXWPu3EB/fpb+xapRA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b92:b0:717:8a98:8169 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-719263abd5bmr11354084b3a.1.1726242524601; Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd ([2405:6586:be0:0:c8ff:1707:9b9:af89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-719090c37efsm6235223b3a.187.2024.09.13.08.48.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Sep 2024 08:48:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:48:41 +0900 Message-Id: <87seu3tuzq.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: control message for bug #72154 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) merge 72154 66776 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 21 16:29:56 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2024 20:29:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53589 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t2z2K-0004au-Be for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:29:56 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:52136) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1t2z21-0004aH-NS for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:29:38 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id 32AA53312CE; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:29:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1729542550; bh=PwEQwaSjMXvVLMLYkpw94oWg8s9mGAk8PyIZ5BPdgK4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=WJuPCePJUKdGqSVnSd9+IqEocRS2VAiSeJ2GsZAcpivf5cp1fVvaRjhdstEnjZtIH lABhuji62v8d1PsuyBBn1U1y0lZFuKqhyssdg+yHaltq+uvxC/fDfISV2GM+QSn1j2 5Wi50GfKutLAoTdFruNtIQePE8i+vWjLzknI2i5g/Y9vb3kyh+gxc6vPh/cGuMznJ0 GIcczagiU6urnbaLA++fTbNO/A5MeeMyrTD3ctbZlMDAefHZiBVpQqeNNyVkvyD2kb hJXL5QgcyHD3045itJODqajcQ3dzw6EutNUJVkp/2DNtUhviiCDhyyhnjLrUI1l+Pd pw8KbGlceGS/+DNxMWuG5CLKksNaiwrlhLVIlKz5MflRDa4QhwFI4Zs9H/7EBb4C6p bznoSoFkTj6ZIXxkdN5s/CgCiUMXb1cC0kXMpvD0JkMXgm5jJLhOEDlXxSgKFyFStj SgUn7OWC9Za/BE6Hh6fhfkgXylLkwieVmfgf8TE6wFoTAvOZuZOMv+EjzVvU93dFAe w6ow+VjxvpYK8KRneA7eDuOTBedpAhmFamqNOAXSdZoKP3n/HKBuCKZZgDRq/8iGUp jafPE3iDBmMEErKs1MzWbXlSqJNM7J3VQMR2buIBpQhcMcQX57H67KpesW99dfa6Iu hjB/g24GiPMxz05Y0EMTbL9c= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [193.32.127.157]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAC5D3319A0 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:29:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1729542549; bh=PwEQwaSjMXvVLMLYkpw94oWg8s9mGAk8PyIZ5BPdgK4=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=tCOUP0YtXodJXNbhrTFWKHv8X2FkVZ34PjJISikC9CfW4BMaTNcBTaq0djk95Ohol hxxgMBdX6kWoJyuMexBT0s5Kqi0dXsdxZaKkqMD58msvwhs+YTl1LdFhiuotRkq2zA Y+JWq4RWCWDJprvEK/AVmQcd6Uxl6m4TiiMu4cQy0rRWa4R28LqsML3Kxsnti4aJ+b mvn7AprVkFF3aIdLqTILJ2V5vL2sWKeiTVNwjNyOjn/rP/SDG1yEaBQ3xxgrzill8j eAidjx7q6hmyd50ZkXU7wYuk4q6F9UHWD1WsFjLpq+HGdJwIg035unVgmmO3ILzXk1 PEseZ9NOoNuzJ8gANK8pfz2U8CQMCttNTtCAIzxuNLVvu746q2cFF8TryoVGiNXL6b IABXjNWMHnZ6RrlfjeHb8blCEAttMe5Sc64O9s6CD8lZPRZG07v29GnkuKcZ+CfOey OnGqiK1WaUxeJbvTiE3ywYjymixZAnFFr0lhTUIUk+IGRvDdUJg6D7nz5ot+ZUFtWl l9xc+x24AbbQwsJbuXzU60wwHYwfkOwDmJNS2b8o/r6S/DAq1mF67+l3xyC98Bbk4e 8x+yERHnFmsYGx5nz2NNYohDbnBBRNFn9pW7fnUP3hQ3EgR1/OG08/BJ9E8Af7RU/4 kY3ewXIeShUFWs01GoGDvXlw= Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:29:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Subject: control message for bug #72154 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 72154 quit From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:39 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator