GNU bug report logs - #66756
30.0.50; [PATCH] Improve discussion of 'let' in Elisp Introduction manual

Previous Next

Full log

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 30.0.50; [PATCH] Improve discussion of 'let' in Elisp Introduction
 manual
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:54:25 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

(Spun out from bug#66706. My previous message below.)

On 10/25/2023 8:48 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
> On 10/25/2023 6:19 PM, Jim Porter wrote:
>> I'll start with a patch here then. I think this is also a prime spot
>> to add an example or two that would actually show lexical binding in
>> action (i.e. a sample where the code would do something different
>> under dynamic binding).
>
> Here's a first attempt. I'm not sure I'm entirely happy with it (the
> digression into setting 'lexical-binding' to 't' is a bit disruptive),
> but hopefully it's an improvement. Of course, we can keep adjusting this
> further as needed.

[0001-Introduce-let-using-lexical-binding-in-the-Lisp-Intr.patch (text/plain, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.