GNU bug report logs -
#66756
30.0.50; [PATCH] Improve discussion of 'let' in Elisp Introduction manual
Previous Next
Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:56:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Found in version 30.0.50
Fixed in version 29.2
Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #41 received at 66756 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com> writes:
Hi Jim,
> +In some cases, both lexical and dynamic binding behave identically.
> +However, in other cases, they can change the meaning of your program.
> +For example, under lexical binding, if you call a function inside of a
> +@code{let} body, that function's body would be unable to ``see'' (or
> +modify) the value of a local variable from the @code{let} expression:
> +
> +@example
> +;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
> +
> +(setq x 1)
> +
> +(defun getx ()
> + x)
> +
> +(let ((x 2))
> + (getx))
> + @result{} 1
> +@end example
> +
> +@noindent
> +If we use dynamic binding instead, the behavior is different:
> +
> +@example
> +;;; -*- lexical-binding: nil -*-
> +
> +(setq x 1)
> +
> +(defun getx ()
> + x)
> +
> +(let ((x 2))
> + (getx))
> + @result{} 2
> +@end example
> +
> +Now, the result of @samp{(getx)} is @samp{2}! That's because under
> +dynamic binding, when @code{getx} looks for the value of @code{x}, it
> +sees the value we set in our @code{let} expression. In other words,
> +the call to @code{getx} happens during the @emph{time} when our
> +@code{let} expression is active. Under lexical binding, @code{getx}
> +doesn't see the value from our @code{let} expression. That's because
> +it happens in a different @emph{place} than the @code{let} body.
Would it be worth to emphasize, that a declaration of x changes this?
That is, when a variable is declared, both lexical and dynamic binding
behave identically.
@example
;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
(devfar x 1)
(defun getx ()
x)
(let ((x 2))
(getx))
@result{} 2
@end example
Best regards, Michael.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 229 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.