Subject: Re: bug#6675: 23.2; field, header and headers

From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:34:54 +0200

tags 6675 wontfix
close 6675
thanks

Kevin Rodgers <[email-masked]> writes:

>> Yes, it's unfortunate that (especially older) functions in Gnus use
>> "field" where we really mean "header", but changing function names and
>> breaking third-party code for consistency here isn't worth it.
>
> defalias + make-obsolete = define-obsolete-function-alias

Not worth the churn.  Or breaking stuff eventually.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/