GNU bug report logs - #66743
30.0.50; Crash when dumping reftex

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>

Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:46:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Found in version 30.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
Cc: gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, 66743 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#66743: 30.0.50; Crash when dumping reftex
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 14:01:32 +0300
> From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92 <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: gerd.moellmann <at> gmail.com, stefankangas <at> gmail.com, 66743 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:55:37 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> If `error' does all the necessary cleanup, `emacs_abort' is indeed not
> >> necessary. But that's not very obvious from the source code.
> >
> > What cleanup is needed in this case?
> 
> I have no idea.
> To be clear: I am not sure what is the difference between `emacs_abort'
> and `error'.

AFAIU, in batch mode there's no difference, since calling 'error'
shows a backtrace and exits.

> If you say that using `error' instead of `emacs_abort' is safe, I will
> just follow. I expect that you know these details well.

I think it's safe, since we already do that in other places in
pdumper.c.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 204 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.