GNU bug report logs - #66700
30.0.50; Some history is missing with multiple eshell buffers

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Liu Hui <liuhui1610 <at> gmail.com>
To: Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 66700 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#66700: 30.0.50; Some history is missing with multiple eshell buffers
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 18:23:57 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name> 于2023年12月6日周三 23:33写道：
>
> On Thu 16 Nov 2023 at 05:47pm +08, Liu Hui wrote:
>
> > Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com> 于2023年11月15日周三 01:15写道：
> >>
> >> On 11/14/2023 4:43 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> >> > On Tue 14 Nov 2023 at 02:32pm +02, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> IMO, this is too soon to change the default behavior in incompatible
> >> >> ways.  We need to wait for a while, perhaps at least one major
> >> >> release, before we do that.
> >> >
> >> > This is fair enough.  It would be really useful to have the default
> >> > behaviour now for those of used to it from other shells, though -- Liu,
> >> > perhaps you would be interested in adding a defcustom?
> >>
> >> Yeah, I think a defcustom would be good here. That would also make it
> >> easier for us to test out the new code and find any bugs.
> >
> > Thank you all for your suggestions. A defcustom has been added in the
> > attached patch without changing previous behavior.
>
> Thanks.  This looks good, but can you add a NEWS entry, please?
>
> Ideally it would also get documented in the Eshell manual.

Thanks for your feedback. I have updated the patch as suggested.

[0001-Add-option-eshell-history-append.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.