From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 20 17:45:00 2023 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2023 21:45:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41777 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxIh-0007LF-Gl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:45:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:470:142::17]:35870) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxIe-0007L0-Rs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:44:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxI7-0007Yz-HC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:44:23 -0400 Received: from sonic315-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.134.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxI4-0005Pm-92 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 17:44:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cs.com; s=a2048; t=1697838257; bh=3olX/5P2EEjh95X+5Z4vrBGM61zj7+tX9v0f0hF8NrQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=TPOWexHn6dSpofLVg3dIvgw3ZK9pnY46KGvnNChoJ8Z0dgCQTkkJXVt6i+yzWeHFJrsibl7CX6P+7jrjpLQsGQXVb27IQREM7gu7jVpDwY8OmUWbhG+qfPJECW5DFohvYdLkI1rGlna9H1/uOX1Fvc8w2+kTr06CT8IvWl65dbqW1Rk2fj9BOn4ywltkOCWQGqxErKuW6NIz4olTTBkyr8vHWil3O019jwm43cVnjiKcjkPv7VwUn7xuClzPt7DQsNC3o2s03uID7o8sRtdcSjAOxy2h4NkfEOjiH5W/fXYXhLLq+0HjumUkU3uph/Z/ecqatoftnHHjLJFUN5ZE0w== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1697838257; bh=nr/LUWp5JX3t3Jz8PISAWBqJ6jTNfMZlVx/T6r0LCb2=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=J0GXecM50VEPlMcUkvLGu2TXQtj8pqo1lZOSZltEx85bBpTfpazNxrPrujq+l90mpcCW2IL2Qson0zJNeyVKpiVSLQO4fnP4B7njvrsGTkoeIx7JXX0QGhtRaOOJF4j6/q2Nvx4hZ3o/tsfLm3J2Sb/CF93/bAgjNjXftMai9ihes90l7oH0lnGkaz9zXC/aud4seQRBZCTaogFZ4KBHX2rlYbuLRgbRrkL1gTH1HYCowqHRenG0KXBU80UWPVFg6UiT2oWjJR1hCx2fGDVjIoxFOPphQjuiqylFXRaDCzUm0PLlgKnf6einv8Z4khChtKRWvc6hwGkKseSNkLKSPg== X-YMail-OSG: OdbTC3IVM1mCFlf3apdlhEPU2ZyjI_YR4yefyPZDXyx_fMun7f295JrLJMJKVTQ x1I7gJdNhk5vejFKT6AhxI9JRiar2qxLFHHh.n1sdn8LxJJXToq_mThb7y1rq0AsjT_wVhFE3Lzp tuZDZou9BwOplNk0jpKvaYqmjwhhcvBLklC9potEydEvgYZWX6XKuEe3wLIaffsr5bVA5Qzk4Glu 8EL65ql8mnvncJqpQ2KXIue48GF2LBKC.QrfyxSmx9w32kR5hoWGU3ElXDE2uKXFikmk19b8PnTJ .KylJZ3jyVifvDCuiJ8sJIeW1AgCFLCKfBl_fM7QFpLtzSkL6VsThlKS3vJnh5kXVwN0oaSh0rFW g5OG4VZawC0iPdgHdD2xZkQw8N2BSNAQbzW4VM93NZ7vSVboAqFgprjhv.yz41XG0fzksBmXBdLM 7076nGl_B99LtfvrwE4rLOteMFPPakrATYzzRHiRb.pAyVgs9jOQv_ihlNBP8a8uf8baa2jm5zEx 3lE4xgN3flPCnfK3hWK6AeTTXSw0PhqlGlo7KAmEygYK2_SWq9U8qr9_QcaCsmzEXxwQPnLNc98l jTbvR5tuVixbFezPfz4m9eXatccSTcqYPOX4QGKQ98Say2S16apIKTrpT.AFF2SLvxL_Oc8dMDEv EQfANoroSdZ1G6HBCUW7GK6qpDwMu.Tb5aqQTSj0WeIeKz8Kl3nljK.ZxQ7SYhOVW.IfRI_KxOGr VBqLb31PFmjtSewFNf_KvR.8YUiXp.0OP1UEi58lWErmfrOfP4uAt.m3Kgtcr8hAU_2ovFApeQCE dxnugpmqV1cfQ0knSQ1ceFvVZ9PyGhnHgK4F65NtFseuFrJyWAMA6sjEkg7xZV.IB4QMXIl6Vin3 aXCEVbPr9kWo0pwnO5WS4.3RLbUDB0LPlv.P5B5UwljyiAEaOJ9A6a5uuO8Jyi2YyLf1un2_v1TY CTQVF9kuzWQ2RqGyis5SGutb1Tix.4FxRpKh52h_cROL2NijRGj4_sbiZHYr.yy04CADwqNqLIl_ k5.PlEB3MfN9btmJN3XpjKPLg1Vg071CHyvMIjuG_rvXbi3MoTcWS61iYB2K._omah68N1hmSZhj yHtuG5WYQv5e1k7TyvPPA38H9WTC7IG.FUazyo_bL.3DYXgnTQGgLl_SCo4EGVYXDfvAHj5aCDMr ZdJol_VFPOJSU1uEZIeApZtEgswmaJCOLwP_xaVDhzxiu_juwAp_fwGujDMYRt3V85KX7ESciMqS qP_IvSSWYwPxg7NOuIcSVUG4X1JDRvHzu3o_D2gh22UnspgZ0C9O2ysQqSJuoDjRThwVoS3qxyt4 3ezGJNSTHR1eiIwduRKMGcdQgXcdZ0vuxkqqMYwBu6uHgwlx5HphyUk.xWz6lfeA743fWV1gb09m EflnsAKBeo.1NHzVgt6zT_VpTKGgaIJNnmhrcby4EgX20bHgvGVR85Q7mXGgV_zHK1Po37z0WXLS fmt0GGdMbAvGBDw1690wGMqqhASpCwl3rwLP4YuB073foZrWEKSt0SIAhtnqXA_VtQBzJ6n.67Fz D46e.zmBRlMl3G1LFPBCreYxWZ5fUT3ABhfOjsCS2zxiCHgvjYcIztUxcs.Kgg4skUmHMNL4Lj_J 7lM1kYFKJ4g0I7OCT5M7KgGlh4XZbTh7_EFeS5n9Y9n65YjjrS0m0oOYLOju_KmBg5XZqJIM0RXN vBPMkiAA9.0Qs3tI9pOs_Xds4Eftx9Uni90xO.AxiukTmJZM4XmxwFWbCI0t1eMeW.fQGdy2HYMA _V55TblRyjU18hpsSzmgUY3_5YV8djGXqUwARqJLJvEmMFQFo1bL5GsOG4GEEdYMriFE830dG_k2 UhL08lM3mkD7dPJT5kEw1KoSrnkJ5MjjNvgVlAIcXDTErd5UUDNinh.X5KpdjBTeka5EMpNIkIrQ RaVc5gPx26rtK6U0K1fbCZXJ_oeSzj.FkIJoagBF8tmkLEDqYH3xscQmyatsWToorB.jYNty8Th7 yXGQ0SZ2KuqOaKvQqRJSPPrkC3NeXWcZCgGCk4UOWWkTgxhATYow2ViaO1OrXBVdLT0ZqPQy3LHx VcjS98zlO7HuU5DS4N6ETjjaDebCtKqMsC6.dfEMXuSTs6v7rSr6JGRsVn47Ic3p7CrKVfNP9VWo 2jw0KbyZWaiRnXwfAtm_nERwwzlU5iCYeV7ZkFzpelxLfrRiMMp1xJ5nbIRmtn.P4ovM- X-Sonic-MF: X-Sonic-ID: ccbec0b1-3c23-405e-9dc3-8db57764c5b9 Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:44:17 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) From: Lewis Creary To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Message-ID: <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Bug reports MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_294114_1484332855.1697838145834" References: <472007690.294115.1697838145836.ref@mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.21797 AolMailNorrin Content-Length: 7490 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.134.124; envelope-from=lewcreary@cs.com; helo=sonic315-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) ------=_Part_294114_1484332855.1697838145834 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm reporting a bug in Gnu emacs lisp, but I'm also reporting a bug in thep= rocess of reporting emacs lisp bugs.=C2=A0 This first bug consists in the f= actthat, in bug reports sent using M-x report-emacs-bug, my email address (= lewcreary@cs.com, in the "from:" field of the email), would have been mangl= ed into a somewhat similar, but different, address in the process of submit= ting the report.=C2=A0 As a result, any acknowledgment email intended for m= e (but sent to the mangled address) would not reach me, but wouldinstead ge= nerate a "no such person" mailing error. The main bug I'm reporting consists in the fact that recently, when I tried= to test the lisp function displayed just below, I triggered the lisp errorm= essage "`let' bindings can have only one value-form", when it is clear from= inspection of the let* form in question that no such bug exists.=C2=A0 The= let* form in question does have just one value-form, the lisp variable=C2= =A0 =C2=A0eight-powr-sum.. (defun octal-to-dec (n)=C2=A0 (let* ((oct-str {number-to-string n)=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(octal-digits (string-to-reverse-numlist oct-str= ))=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(oct-digit nil)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0(eight-powr-term-val 0)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(eight-p= owr-sum 0)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(indx 0)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0(while-nil-val (while (<=3D indx (length octal-digits)) =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(setq oct-digit (nth indx octal-digits)= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0eight-powr-te= rm-val (* oct-digit (expt 8 indx))=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0eight-powr-sum (+ eight-powr-sum eight-powr-term-val)= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0indx (1+ inde= x) ))) ) ; end of let-variables=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0eight-powr-sum ))) Subject: 29.1; "lisp error when there is no error" In GNU Emacs 29.1 (build 2, x86_64-w64-mingw32) of 2023-08-02 built on=C2= =A0AVALONWindowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.22621= System Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Home (v10.0.2009.22621.2428) Configured using:=C2=A0'configure --with-modules --without-dbus --with-nati= ve-compilation=3Daot=C2=A0--without-compress-install --with-tree-sitter CFL= AGS=3D-O2' Configured features:ACL GIF GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LIBXML2 MOD= ULES NATIVE_COMPNOTIFY W32NOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SOUND SQLITE3 THREADS TIF= FTOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP XPM ZLIB (NATIVE_COMP present but libgccjit not available) Important settings:=C2=A0 value of $LANG: ENU=C2=A0 locale-coding-system: c= p1252 Major mode: ELisp/d ------=_Part_294114_1484332855.1697838145834 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
= I'm reporting a bug in Gnu emacs lisp, but I'm also reporting a bug in the<= /div>
process of reporting emacs lisp bugs.  This first bug consis= ts in the fact
that, in bug rep= orts sent using M-x report-emacs-bug, my email address (lewcreary@cs.com, i= n the "from:" field of the email), would have been mangled into a somewhat = similar, but different, address in the process of submitting the report.&nb= sp; As a result, any acknowledgment email intended for me (but sent to the = mangled address) would not reach me, but would
instead generate a= "no such person" mailing error.

The main bug I'm reporting consists in the fact that recen= tly, when I tried
to test the lisp function displayed just below, = I triggered the lisp error
message "`let' bindings can have only = one value-form", when it is clear from inspection of the let* form in quest= ion that no such bug exists.  The let* form in question does have just= one value-form, the lisp variable 
 eight-powr-sum..<= /div>

(defun octal-to-dec (n)
  (let* ((oct-str {numb= er-to-string n)
        &n= bsp;(octal-digits (string-to-reverse-numlist oct-str))
         (oct-digit nil)
         (eight-powr-te= rm-val 0)
        &= nbsp;(eight-powr-sum 0)
    &= nbsp;    (indx 0)
        &n= bsp;(while-nil-val (while (<=3D indx (length octal-digits))
=09=09=09           (setq oc= t-digit (nth indx octal-digits)
  =                eight-powr-term-val = (* oct-digit (expt 8 indx))
  &nbs= p;              eight-powr-sum (+ eight-= powr-sum eight-powr-term-val)
  &n= bsp;              indx (1+ index) ))) ) = ; end of let-variables
     eight-powr-sum = )))

Subject: 29.1; "lisp error when there is no error"

In GNU Emacs 29.1 (build 2, x86_64-w= 64-mingw32) of 2023-08-02 built on
 AVALON
Windowi= ng system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 10.0.22621
Syste= m Description: Microsoft Windows 10 Home (v10.0.2009.22621.2428)
=
Configured using:
 'configure --with-modules = --without-dbus --with-native-compilation=3Daot
 --without-co= mpress-install --with-tree-sitter CFLAGS=3D-O2'

Co= nfigured features:
ACL GIF GMP GNUTLS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LI= BXML2 MODULES NATIVE_COMP
NOTIFY W32NOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SOUND= SQLITE3 THREADS TIFF
TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS TREE_SITTER WEBP XPM ZL= IB

(NATIVE_COMP present but libgccjit not availabl= e)

Important settings:
  value of $= LANG: ENU
  locale-coding-system: cp1252

Major mode: ELisp/d

------=_Part_294114_1484332855.1697838145834-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Oct 20 18:07:41 2023 Received: (at 66656) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2023 22:07:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxeb-00087q-VL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:07:41 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:44775) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qtxeW-00087Z-1Q for 66656@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:07:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=s31663417; t=1697839616; x=1698444416; i=stephen.berman@gmx.net; bh=k9bDBeX19WpVUT9v2kGv3FwDnAW2VNzEv0Z/YOx0AQk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=A8Ha8SnrBzW5eZzJjSDrXRHzY6AIPoGUF+Ima6eGuXHPPDExTtCQ4aNhQR0IKdoY 1XHrSNTEeGCzBOgiDNSDV9gWYeAKpqP0WJOX4F3XB6m1OS5w3UsT/YvWv9LQQ8ywB BmCCWuEHqMh7GwHE/9QFYezvkHRDjC4wxVvQSt6hjSQDHhfM5Jpgg+IDpRHc4kmQQ CjWtz7QDKHyCtxHYBG/VrVjDW0QgW9vVASvnJqJw8LkANeqMtlbAxj9C7c90kQ0cj 6L2rAuEnWiNUpVSVIO+MPBb1gY/HE+cVwDYCLeNlgiBC32GCQNU3g9zpmlXIRrL+H Ame6v3vQGtgRSRQH+w== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from strobelfs2 ([89.246.36.225]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MvbBk-1rl6Ws0IMg-00sgEg; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 00:06:56 +0200 From: Stephen Berman To: Lewis Creary via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Subject: Re: bug#66656: Bug reports In-Reply-To: <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> (Lewis Creary via's message of "Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC)") References: <472007690.294115.1697838145836.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 00:06:55 +0200 Message-ID: <877cnhhrsw.fsf@gmx.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Db9Z+Vg9BBbH7BbYNMnQJXFaxf1RY/IL7azAadfUrBHphrWZWtD xlaqjQL/QjmJOF81fAz9b0KB56kuzDc1z4t//mWr/np6efCvjU6BFAWdBf5jMugFEuknJh/ 2gZPP+OVTsF4GENSoeebr5zrh8oLx+9V/4slu6zlAAqSNJOrt/IwOQiKIn7/gZGp843hVRo 6SVQdyuHW/Muz+LilqhEA== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:dya2hZd88D4=;niVGCe+4NX0WOcLJMT7wmvYJUsL PU/vtJqYsWPqPFIbSa+ui1qv45+U0aguHj/0WS4ruffrtOVZ3GXDIM6BWFPUvvCMh5WUgrAvC BiiHx0mMjX2imO0ijNibrTp1OVh0MKDgp6OjPTqnTD5PCATthVOVR70oqhhGQH276Zfde4Nsh txaHFGyTuA2hsDayHlhNA4acfxMFAqAwOs/Q0dNl83c5zTZL766H/9+TIS9JFH4gfvqlzQMmq tcDfzafW2eTT1WGIeBYekL+8cxwn8lCMXHRZywM+w/TkdedQ+0E17s3ZWwuma4z5Jwjn+bHV5 Cq1ihxwfeC7AvyjY5OUnKK2wjdia0r5lP1jSXXk//UdAW9S/6hvDT13nSRG7ITLtkiICjA9vs QDUraYk1yqOfLaAE4BCYekENEaAsEYRdtIYAYczPoI1ZQAY4w9g6vDLeDMeg5AjEdVSbUnV9y IwXgRS/EXLn8btb/YeGkA/3DKxtq4Y+pShl/vVTqLxUysKHBYhsY5Qc+BuyIQbx6AEPOCzy1A JYu8/UlD6h063rOQ2/UJWNQYoPVxi//KgiPJmI+ODhdmS3bGCKNTJJdI//JO87J0qbeHmalAB 6HHB3BqbqfdPk1MEtjcMToJuKiiGpmezLFLFN7qAJKb2E+VFfNtML3dwi/ZECGoVMeI7IjQ/M dj1+AcLdsavfGrynn4pb7PDq+dFoTSfm9DXFbzVV9JvclmXTCAr2bWsQEtRTzoC54qmMwQI58 JCfiFU10jbvMVeufMsNFrNoGVcc/pJiWbGq6rEHCuvfuIj+9QElc+PyQZAWIHpe1hPAtc+QdO 3w8V0wZl9BKMaGTrdVrh/D9gTFNotjttrfMJedPajAh5aZTuhKiwsMYL55UOXgaxD9JzA26Wd A/EK981pjpKnR9r+q2VAd0TRmA4S6UXzwuf/jicI3e8Co/vafOQSsAnC8mAnOWpzS2q7KPVS+ Rl3trqwF1SV6FdoPuUNKVjj4/40= X-Spam-Score: -1.2 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66656 Cc: 66656@debbugs.gnu.org, Lewis Creary X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Lewis Creary via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" wrote: [...] > The main bug I'm reporting consists in the fact that recently, when I > tried to test the lisp function displayed just below, I triggered the > lisp error message "`let' bindings can have only one value-form", when > it is clear from inspection of the let* form in question that no such > bug exists. The let* form in question does have just one value-form, > the lisp variable eight-powr-sum.. > > (defun octal-to-dec (n) > (let* ((oct-str {number-to-string n) > (octal-digits (string-to-reverse-numlist oct-str)) > (oct-digit nil) > (eight-powr-term-val 0) > (eight-powr-sum 0) > (indx 0) > (while-nil-val (while (<= indx (length octal-digits)) > (setq oct-digit (nth indx octal-digits) > eight-powr-term-val (* oct-digit (expt 8 indx)) > eight-powr-sum (+ eight-powr-sum eight-powr-term-val) > indx (1+ index) ))) ) ; end of let-variables > eight-powr-sum ))) The error is because the first let-binding binds `oct-str' to both `{number-to-string' and `n'. I guess `{' is a typo for `(' and there should also be a closing `)': `(oct-str (number-to-string n))'. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 21 03:27:41 2023 Received: (at 66656) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2023 07:27:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42109 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qu6Oa-0006Ps-OS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:27:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35546) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qu6OZ-0006Pf-FH for 66656@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:27:39 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qu6O2-0003ak-Da; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 03:27:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=jPyfRtTQzyTH4OLeHVVtkGTsylZjXjZGZ5+16PXBUcc=; b=n6Z3MSssT6jP iW7nwNdzT1men3jVsKjY9jdQddnA3WWI5OtYKXClObVZyoLdaKqrKMgSycti9op+CexIKmVbOBJza WXbtHe0pa69JgHdqEN3Jz6VaVp8uOz8JtO0ZY8N/439s5nYn8Sb7/6j+8kipiWibLUa7b6hI15YX6 JL/DVgyl9brt8gk0c4M3axMn6NufljgY5gicbQdq0ilvCyEKjmv0mOSozFQ8P7wO1250yEJSJMGwd hVB4X9ep1VgDn2eLJV5TOiDsppetboht8IWCfCfwFQytgzlysnn1XGV22SRk4x9Mr4CNClQfVJCsl G0LQRliYnxc+87drn2vezA==; Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 10:27:04 +0300 Message-Id: <83edhosaev.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lewis Creary In-Reply-To: <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> (bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org) Subject: Re: bug#66656: Bug reports References: <472007690.294115.1697838145836.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66656 Cc: 66656@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) > From: Lewis Creary via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, > the Swiss army knife of text editors" > > I'm reporting a bug in Gnu emacs lisp, but I'm also reporting a bug in the > process of reporting emacs lisp bugs. This first bug consists in the fact > that, in bug reports sent using M-x report-emacs-bug, my email address (lewcreary@cs.com, in the > "from:" field of the email), would have been mangled into a somewhat similar, but different, address > in the process of submitting the report. As a result, any acknowledgment email intended for me (but > sent to the mangled address) would not reach me, but would > instead generate a "no such person" mailing error. AFAIK, this should not happen. In particular, this response email, where the To: header was produced by my MUA, has your correct unmangled email address. > The main bug I'm reporting consists in the fact that recently, when I tried > to test the lisp function displayed just below, I triggered the lisp error > message "`let' bindings can have only one value-form", when it is clear from inspection of the let* form > in question that no such bug exists. The let* form in question does have just one value-form, the lisp > variable > eight-powr-sum.. As Steve points out, the first binding includes an error, a typo, where { was used instead of (. I see no Emacs bug here. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 21 05:14:51 2023 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2023 09:14:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qu84I-00040E-RI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:14:51 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]:47388) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qu84H-0003zz-1O for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 05:14:49 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507c50b7c36so2222190e87.3 for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 02:14:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697879655; x=1698484455; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ao5dBuPxijZc4J31ZVg3CCOL1wGCRZ3T7LurT2srfQQ=; b=L/aSmLRNOHCz6/kkN5TOSJ4KxZKem85+wiuFk6xJ/o/PqJpZ/IfCMh90FlZ97SJd+c qVJICNMa9vjTpF3myWp+4mqI7kX6EKxyUUcU5qbAmvdugZTH3SjmP2v7ZhCfzyT0oSG4 YbDRwPYQqe+jQLrc6kOnctXjnsdrZgOgky2V0d25BwJLScyYonoSrE3uRcv+2M8SYsHv q67Ob78Cy92l2ax6wDh/bUmxAziynzTl8mKiZsgheCctXOYn3OFWtCbbMqkZPUbMjHKF 7cjPzhmMKf9rqXsPKhHJZ6SoW4zQIafDHulMin+Ll5nfxmwpy4ZkaveZVkqW2++tTbe+ cLKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697879655; x=1698484455; h=to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ao5dBuPxijZc4J31ZVg3CCOL1wGCRZ3T7LurT2srfQQ=; b=CQnYIrowZ1HsB1ulgOBEj2lCxRMLHR4e2LTrjWRr1rl7ysuT9hRAqaTtw+shj5daeK vEpSNTJj44KJoFS33fcTznuVSKCg97NiLqHwSPYqhWkXpFIVlGELieJKbYH+H9dP5dCq Uw/cbtRSILZcD6sL8uAm01IcJlejtR0OXRlxG2pRcAz99lhAsiePoKM7SD+9SPj9tVnT LxxviJhxY1vViNCo0eIXYY/JAYkIFgHGymPyMxi8TuLNm1SpfKg2Mjwk3jjfPraODihh HsatkKtM5VyBaUh8YLxkWiNDcqN97ud3K7XnoehfQUp5h6AQMILkV8DwCckFAmFAv1rU PZcQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7gsj3ClwovetOJWmb74wUbNPX8Zjj2FGap7wlwxboZZ8htcQf LTKf5vVPOfkquSOO5+Al19ns1cdBUF7vt6L4HdqaCWPP0sbqvw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGB6+nNJz5XPm8eF9Y1wWqSEQYNmIxIEkwusrqcmx479kmBs0FUaLw489Q4HlNPX4jhmNnnykWHmBskL5r76YE= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5967:0:b0:500:90d1:90a6 with SMTP id h7-20020ac25967000000b0050090d190a6mr2454296lfp.63.1697879655030; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 02:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sat, 21 Oct 2023 02:14:14 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2023 02:14:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: # not a bug, probably tags 66656 + notabug thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2a00:1450:4864:20:0:0:0:12c listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) # not a bug, probably tags 66656 + notabug thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Dec 22 09:57:18 2023 Received: (at 66656-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2023 14:57:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47534 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rGgxi-00040m-3N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:57:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]:59736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rGgxg-00040Y-Pn for 66656-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 09:57:17 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-554265b5b1eso1824269a12.3 for <66656-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:57:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1703257026; x=1703861826; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WFT7ApnSCoLSN0WsxSolem2LKGMInDEhAnJPgoYh1ac=; b=FXHn7VsAX41kst7mJ6sFpJJZmZEBcAkna47NelCWGpMBAyTT8jU/1Kx9NKxBN8y+ws /2Y1G9Vl0NXxm/dDaDmo01X/YwWwxbu8rZSKKxJFaCSPVt8EVG1QCgY6fTjDsX+nrDod ySpHpTL7I2Zyt2dlyxkN3itEwNH30HzncIDkoMrpZWlRo7uEoJp2OH/Jc8A7HcdgO5P+ th1Vf883wZ7LyePQd/b3zju7pm4BORQ4/HzSTAX2eZD5IcEyIqCshfeeoJm5CAbPvOZa pJrbBm9o4P5fHxB9izgAzNxHCb5Yma98F/RHJAz8e1C39zoGfGEqILzQGLTedx6HYYb5 p62A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1703257026; x=1703861826; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WFT7ApnSCoLSN0WsxSolem2LKGMInDEhAnJPgoYh1ac=; b=DcOJRac1+b9x57TwsZcHUoIWQzgboLm62xPyGF4fPSRNkl5gYTDgj4h01Lfg8Nb5Wq pj6xEj5cYEiZvjB6cHE1tSX1V13WbiYRA3EiLx4TnG6jSag8y6sni1vRYheZQQov78MN NYhDE267UbFvCQ7XMWAKG7NkV9WYR1Owg2OG6cZoueTNR04kp7Pt4ghI6e73DDl8wPGc e9RW2+rhgL/Zpog9yfxknLvnCXNHtV6O3gFCos+pxtBvauLw80qpUCE5KuUomDQfrczj hDJKC9fTQ3J8uKzfm6kFUn1fuzOsE9RGVvfzy35zh9/1vdbxTgsssF5BUr1XwsM6XhQP kTZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzADiJcYnwP94VEwmSg92bR/FtgmRRLpY7OKyOVofn8ht4rj2bu c6WOiVVBGsVS8ol4HKzDDubyZA9t6KiyNZ7gFipXi/nSG8kSPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvh2KizXL3MG67koqxzwKceZ5CoseKH8seZHvyKCsFqS+p6JfThJLnr/L/YdDRanpBTqtgS77bO/iQeVUFeWM= X-Received: by 2002:a50:ba8b:0:b0:553:4841:9c37 with SMTP id x11-20020a50ba8b000000b0055348419c37mr358825ede.57.1703257026177; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:57:05 -0800 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83edhosaev.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 21 Oct 2023 10:27:04 +0300") References: <472007690.294115.1697838145836.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <472007690.294115.1697838145836@mail.yahoo.com> <83edhosaev.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 06:57:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#66656: Bug reports To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 66656-done Cc: 66656-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Lewis Creary X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Lewis Creary via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" >> >> I'm reporting a bug in Gnu emacs lisp, but I'm also reporting a bug in the >> process of reporting emacs lisp bugs. This first bug consists in the fact >> that, in bug reports sent using M-x report-emacs-bug, my email address (lewcreary@cs.com, in the >> "from:" field of the email), would have been mangled into a somewhat similar, but different, address >> in the process of submitting the report. As a result, any acknowledgment email intended for me (but >> sent to the mangled address) would not reach me, but would >> instead generate a "no such person" mailing error. > > AFAIK, this should not happen. In particular, this response email, > where the To: header was produced by my MUA, has your correct > unmangled email address. > >> The main bug I'm reporting consists in the fact that recently, when I tried >> to test the lisp function displayed just below, I triggered the lisp error >> message "`let' bindings can have only one value-form", when it is clear from inspection of the let* form >> in question that no such bug exists. The let* form in question does have just one value-form, the lisp >> variable >> eight-powr-sum.. > > As Steve points out, the first binding includes an error, a typo, > where { was used instead of (. > > I see no Emacs bug here. I'm therefore closing this bug report. From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:28:37 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 12:24:16 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator