GNU bug report logs - #66653
Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>

Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 66653 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#66653; Package guix. (Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:20:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 18:18:13 +0000

Hi all,

I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept the 'standard build options' like -f.

Does anyone have arguments against it?

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent on the go.  Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Changed bug title to 'Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?' from 'Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?' Request was from Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 22 Oct 2023 11:50:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#66653; Package guix. (Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:31:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 66653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, 66653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66653: Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:02:55 +0200

Hi,

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept
> the 'standard build options' like -f.
>
> Does anyone have arguments against it?

No arguments against it. :-)

Cheers,
simon
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#66653; Package guix. (Tue, 24 Oct 2023 14:44:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 66653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, 66653 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66653: Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:42:35 -0400

Hi Tobias,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports
> for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept
>> the 'standard build options' like -f.
>>
>> Does anyone have arguments against it?
>
> No arguments against it. :-)

Neither from me.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 232 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.