GNU bug report logs -
#6663
#if 0 blocks in source code
Previous Next
Reported by: Christoph <cschol2112 <at> googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:11:02 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: notabug, wontfix
Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 6663 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 6663 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6663
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Christoph <cschol2112 <at> googlemail.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
I noticed a couple of #if 0 blocks in keyboard.c, which have explicit comments
that the code within the block is obsolete. A quick grep "#if 0" showed
about 200 instances of disabled or obsolete code in files in the src directory.
Should these instances be cleaned up?
Christoph
Information forwarded
to
owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#6663
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 6663 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 00:10, Christoph <cschol2112 <at> googlemail.com> wrote:
> I noticed a couple of #if 0 blocks in keyboard.c, which have explicit comments
> that the code within the block is obsolete. A quick grep "#if 0" showed
> about 200 instances of disabled or obsolete code in files in the src directory.
>
> Should these instances be cleaned up?
Not blindly, no.
Some of these code is not obsolete, it's just that it has not been
made to work yet (ISTR there's such code in parts of the w32 image
support, for example, but I could be wrong).
Some of it is indeed obsolete, but (I think) it was felt that having
it around to see would preclude people reinventing tried-and-discarded
ways. That was perhaps more relevant with CVS than Bazaar (or not,
because we still don't have a web interface to easily see past
versions, and relying on bzr blame is clumsy).
In other words, IMHO the answer is that some of these #if 0 blocks
could and should be removed, but you'll have to look at them, exercise
good sense and perhaps ask. Which is why most of them has never been
removed, I suppose :-) Though lately, Dan and Glenn have spearheaded
a big cleanup, so times, they are a-changing.
Juanma
Added tag(s) wontfix.
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Christoph <cschol2112 <at> googlemail.com>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Wed, 06 Feb 2013 19:15:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #15 received at 6663-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Sorry, I see no value in keeping this report open.
The #if 0s will either decay with time or they wont. Having a bug report
about it won't change anything.
Closing as wontfix.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Thu, 07 Mar 2013 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 12 years and 106 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.