Subject: Re: bug#66610: Acknowledgement (potrace, po4a; guix bug, complete console output)

From: Olav Smorholm <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:04:47 +0200

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:21:06PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote:
> Tried to reproduce, but with no substitutes and no grafts.
> Wed Oct 18 18:48:34 2023] mes[19410]: segfault at 0 ip 0000000001016085 sp 00000000ffff5044 error 6 in mes[1000000+18000] likely on CPU 4 (core 8, socket 0)
> [Wed Oct 18 18:48:34 2023] Code: 60 01 01 e8 71 ef ff ff 83 c4 04 85 c0 b8 00 00 00 00 89 45 fc b8 00 00 00 00 bb 00 00 00 00 50 89 d8 8b 5d fc 01 d8 89 c3 58 <88> 03 85 c0 c9 c3 3a 00 61 73 73 65 72 74 20 66 61 69 6c 3a 20 00
> 
> Which should be the first, and perhaps only one before conf and tests.
> Reported as guix binary requested with caveats that while GNU, i tend to opt
> for UNIX crashy. and could be hard to chase with coincidence mixed in;
> hard to chase.

took much longer with --no-grafts and --no-substitutes, but this also
showed up again, but not the seed.

[Thu Oct 19 12:18:54 2023] xsltproc[5943]: segfault at 7fffff7fefe0 ip 00007ffff7b952ce sp 00007fffff7fefb0 error 6 in libc.so.6[7ffff7b2a000+167000]

still fairly sure its from guix building.

[Tue Oct 17 21:33:19 2023] process 'bootstrap-seeds/POSIX/x86/kaem-optional-seed' started with executable stack