GNU bug report logs -
#66554
[PATCH] Add the public API of Compat to the core
Previous Next
Reported by: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2023 09:37:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Done: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: mail <at> daniel-mendler.de, 66554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com,
>> monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
>> Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 07:40:23 +0000
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> Daniel, do have any ideas how to improve the documentation here? It
>> >> seems to me that the authoritative source of information on what
>> >> functions to compat-call is Compat itself, right?
>> >
>> > What does Compat manual say about this aspect?
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> Note that Compat provides replacement functions with extended
>> functionality for functions that are already defined (@code{sort},
>> @code{assoc}, @dots{}). These functions may have changed their
>> calling convention (additional optional arguments) or may have changed
>> their behavior. These functions must be looked up explicitly with
>> @code{compat-function} or called explicitly with @code{compat-call}.
>> We call them ``Extended Definitions''. In contrast, newly ``Added
>> Definitions'' can be called as usual.
>
> Thanks. I suggest to copy the above paragraph to the ELisp reference
> manual,
OK, can do.
> and add a cross-reference to the Compat manual after it.
IIUC the cross-reference will be broken, unless the user has installed
Compat manually. Moreover, if I am not mistaken, the documentation
bundled with the Compat package might not be loaded at all, if the
package isn't activated due to the versioning trick. I'd add a link to
the HTML manual, rendered on elpa.gnu.org, but I don't know if this is
conventional.
> Btw, whenever you introduce terminology in our manuals, as in
> ``Extended Definitions'' above, it is best to use the @dfn markup
> instead of literal quotes: the results look better in HTML and printed
> output formats.
Ok.
--
Philip Kaludercic
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 161 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.