GNU bug report logs - #66525
[PATCH 0/7] Remove dependency of polkit, python-dbusmock, etc. on (guix build syscalls)

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 15:47:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66525 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, Raghav Gururajan <rg <at> raghavgururajan.name>
Subject: [bug#66525] [PATCH 1/7] gnu: mutter: Remove dependency on (guix build syscalls).
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 12:19:37 -0400
Hi Ludo,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>>
>>>> I think it could go to core-updates since we're already prepping the
>>>> branch.  It may give some respite to the berlin aarch64 workers, which
>>>> have been working non-stop for days or weeks.
>>>
>>> Yeah, it’s a tempting option in terms of resource usage, but less in
>>> terms of legibility of the whole process.  Dunno.
>>
>> Yeah, for resource usage, bundling this to core-updates makes sense,
>> especially since it should only affect running the test suite of the
>> packages touched, not their output.
>
> OTOH, my initial motivation was to apply patches to syscalls.scm that
> have been queued for quite a while already:
>
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66055
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/66054
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/65546
>
> I fear that bundling it with ‘core-updates’ would delay it by several
> more months.
>
> Resource usage is a concern due to the low AArch64 build power, but it’s
> not too bad lately, even with ‘rust-team’ and ‘gnome-team’ updates:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/metrics
>
> So overall, I think I have a preference for making a dedicated branch
> and queueing a branch merge request.  (I think it’s also good to use
> that process more widely.)
>
> WDYT?

Go for it!  I'm confident core-updates won't take several months, but
who knows :-)

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 305 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.