GNU bug report logs - #66450
29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted patches

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: 66450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#66450: 29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted patches
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 07:06:45 -0700

On 10/17/23 09:03 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
>> Something similar to this have been recently added to the Guix
>> "Contributing" section, see
>> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/The-Perfect-Setup.html#Viewing-Bugs-within-Emacs>
>> or info "(guix) The Perfect Setup".  The regexps have been turned into
>> 'rx' expressions for readability.
>
> Thanks for the information. Scrolling through this guide, maybe I can
> give you some further comments? In
> <https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html>,
> you recommend the command 'C-u M-x debbugs-gnu RET RET guix-patches RET
> n y'. However, if you configure debbugs-gnu-default-packages to '("guix"
> "guix-patches"), you don't need the prefix argument. Furthermore, Guix
> has its own commands in Debbugs, like debbugs-gnu-guix-search.
>
> All of this is off-topic for this bug. But I thought it might be helpful.

Speaking of which... Unless someone wants to make an argument about
changing the defaults of the pipe-article command, it might be time to
close this report. Though it has been unusually productive!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.