GNU bug report logs - #66450
29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted patches

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 18:31:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.1

Done: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #38 received at 66450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: 66450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>,
 Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#66450: 29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted
 patches
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 23:27:27 +0300
Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

> Yup, I know that. I think it comes down to how I keep track of bugs.
> Gnus is the obvious choice for scanning incoming bug reports and seeing
> if any have to do with me (very few of them do!). But Debbugs is the
> natural choice for keeping track of bugs once I do decide to work on
> them. Getting from Gnus to Debbugs isn't a no-brainer -- I once wrote a
> command that adds the bug number of the article under point to
> `debbugs-gnu-tagged', to be called on articles in the
> "nntp:gmane.emacs.bugs" group, but I never managed to form the habit of
> using it.

Can Debbugs do that without affecting an existing summary buffer if
exist before?




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 71 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.