GNU bug report logs - #66450
29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted patches

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
To: Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net>
Cc: 66450 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Bruno Victal <mirai <at> makinata.eu>, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#66450: 29.1; Debbugs/Gnus sometimes corrupt git formatted patches
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 16:41:31 +0200

Eric Abrahamsen <eric <at> ericabrahamsen.net> writes:

Hi Eric,

> Gnus is the obvious choice for scanning incoming bug reports and seeing
> if any have to do with me (very few of them do!). But Debbugs is the
> natural choice for keeping track of bugs once I do decide to work on
> them. Getting from Gnus to Debbugs isn't a no-brainer -- I once wrote a
> command that adds the bug number of the article under point to
> `debbugs-gnu-tagged', to be called on articles in the
> "nntp:gmane.emacs.bugs" group, but I never managed to form the habit of
> using it.

I use a different approach. I have taught Gnus to follow bug references
in Summary and Article buffers. The relevant setting is

(setq bug-reference-url-format "https://debbugs.gnu.org/%s")
(add-hook 'bug-reference-mode-hook 'debbugs-browse-mode)
(add-hook 'bug-reference-prog-mode-hook 'debbugs-browse-mode)

(add-hook 'gnus-summary-mode-hook 'bug-reference-mode)
(add-hook 'gnus-article-mode-hook 'bug-reference-mode)

Then, bug references are highlighted, and I can select them with the mouse.

> Anyway, this bug report isn't the place for the discussion!

Indeed. But there's no proper place for discussion, and the Debbugs User
Guide, which explains this, isn't read by anybody. See
(info "(debbugs-ug) Minor Mode")

So I spread The Truth™ wherever I can :-)

> Thanks,
> Eric

Best regards, Michael.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.