Subject: Re: bug#66448: [PATCH] image: Add 'lba partition label.

From: Gabriel Wicki <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:27:46 +0200

Hello Mathieu

Thanks for looking into it.  And yes, that was exactly what happened.
Plus i was tricked by my own setup (for once showing the LBA label and
another time not).  Oh well (:

I've attached a possible patch for the documentation.

Thanks again for the review and the clarification of the issue.

Best regards

>From eacb1696cdc51350e3d5d223b94a2546c459d2ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
From: Gabriel Wicki <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 14:16:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Clarify partition LBA compatibility.

* doc/guix.texi (partition Reference): Clarify LBA compatibility.
---
 doc/guix.texi | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 3517c95251..6b6d166290 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -45649,7 +45649,8 @@ partition Reference
 @item @code{file-system} (default: @code{"ext4"})
 The partition file system as a string, defaulting to @code{"ext4"}.  The
 supported values are @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"}, @code{"fat32"} and
-@code{"ext4"}.
+@code{"ext4"}.  @code{"vfat"}, @code{"fat16"} and @code{"fat32"}
+partitions without the @code{'esp} flag are by default LBA compatible.
 
 @item @code{file-system-options} (default: @code{'()})
 The partition file system creation options that should be passed to the

base-commit: d389f6777359aa44ef9c71989fc1f49e6b222f1d
-- 
2.41.0