GNU bug report logs -
#66436
[PATCH] doc: Add some guidelines for reviewing.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hi Simon,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Re,
>
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 at 10:49, Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> +Perhaps the biggest action you can do to help GNU Guix grow as a project
>>> +is to review the work contributed by others. You do not need to be a
>>> +committer to do so; applying, reading the source, building, linting and
>>> +running other people's series and sharing your comments about your
>>> +experience will give some confidence to committers, and should result in
>>> +the proposed change being merged faster.
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> [...]
>
>> IMHO, it is worth to clearly state:
>>
>> 1. what helps the review process:
>>
>> « applying, reading the source, building, linting and running other
>> people's series and sharing your comments about your experience will
>> give some confidence to committers, and should result in the
>> proposed change being merged faster. »
>
> Although I do not know if it is the right place, I would mention that
> “building” also means that the dependants still build or clearly
> indicate if something breaks.
That's already mentioned in 'Submitting Patches':
9. Check that dependent packages (if applicable) are not affected by
the change; ‘guix refresh --list-dependent PACKAGE’ will help you
do that (*note Invoking guix refresh::).
I don't think we should repeat it here :-) (also, we now have CI, which
should be more apt at catching breakage here).
--
Thanks,
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 275 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.