GNU bug report logs - #66406
Broken `re-search-forward' (?)

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 10:37:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #19 received at 66406-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev <at> gmail.com>
Cc: contovob <at> tcd.ie, 66406-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66406: Broken `re-search-forward' (?)
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 05:28:00 +0300
> Cc: 66406 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 22:06:23 +0200
> 
> > > In a recent Emacs master (as provided in Silex's Docker image):
> >
> > Any chance of knowing which commit precisely?
> 
> Not really, if you evaluate `emacs-repository-version' on Silex-image-packaged Emacs, result is nil.
> As far as I know, they are just built from Emacs VCS snapshot tarballs, but exact commit hash is lost
> in the build process.  This was even discussed before:
> https://github.com/Silex/docker-emacs/issues/86#issuecomment-1234266607 I don't know the
> details, but apparently GNU provides the snapshots ("archive tarballs are downloaded and
> unpacked"), so you could just inject revision number in the proper place and then get better bug
> reports. I'd provide commit number if I knew it somehow.
> 
> > I get 16 with today's master as well
> 
> Then it is apparently fixed already.

I also get 16, so I presume this bug was already fixed, and I'm
closing it.




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 275 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.