Subject: bug#66345: Invalid hash for [email-masked]

From: Ludovic Courtès <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 18:54:03 +0200

Hello,

We’re getting this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix build -S [email-masked] 
The following derivation will be built:
  /gnu/store/jxgkdnfi81520hx65z4mknndsxb3ggfw-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz.drv
building /gnu/store/jxgkdnfi81520hx65z4mknndsxb3ggfw-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz.drv...

Starting download of /gnu/store/wlr6y6l6m7752591nfkiz3rnfly6hd9p-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz
>From https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/trybuild/1.0.19/download...
following redirection to `https://static.crates.io/crates/trybuild/trybuild-1.0.19.crate'...
downloading from https://crates.io/api/v1/crates/trybuild/1.0.19/download ...
 download  22KiB                                        5.3MiB/s 00:00 ▕██████████████████▏ 100.0%
sha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/wlr6y6l6m7752591nfkiz3rnfly6hd9p-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz:
  expected hash: 0ab7ahdx563n6kbm14pm3qnxq4fp06pz42nh5ii4acvlzycnwdh4
  actual hash:   17xpybcdx76dm54dk7jvr5aickc4ia66qf57bazg7myx8pf6yzcq
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/wlr6y6l6m7752591nfkiz3rnfly6hd9p-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz'
build of /gnu/store/jxgkdnfi81520hx65z4mknndsxb3ggfw-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/jx/gkdnfi81520hx65z4mknndsxb3ggfw-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz.drv.gz'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/jxgkdnfi81520hx65z4mknndsxb3ggfw-rust-trybuild-1.0.19.tar.gz.drv' failed
$ guix describe
Generation 275  Oct 01 2023 23:38:21    (current)
  guix b9fae14
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: b9fae146d6cc4a6968a8eb18beef29aa1414a31e
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

It looks like the hash never matched.  Distopico, do you happen to have
a copy with hash 0ab7ahdx563n6kbm14pm3qnxq4fp06pz42nh5ii4acvlzycnwdh4 on
your disk?  If so, could you check how it compares to the one currently
upstream?

If not, we’ll go ahead and update the hash.

Thanks,
Ludo’.