GNU bug report logs -
#66330
28.2; Gnus wide reply (S W) changes Subject header when used from Debbugs thread
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Thu, 05 Oct 2023 09:53:06 +0200
with message-id <878r8h4ial.fsf <at> gmx.de>
and subject line Re: bug#66330: 28.2; Gnus wide reply (S W) changes Subject header when used from Debbugs thread
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #66330,
regarding 28.2; Gnus wide reply (S W) changes Subject header when used from Debbugs thread
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
66330: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66330
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Hi,
When attempting to reply from an Emacs Debbugs thread specific email,
the Subject line gets set to the subject of the first email in the
thread rather than to that of the specific email I'm replying to, which
looses context.
Example/reproducer:
$ guix shell --container emacs-no-x emacs-debbugs -- emacs
From the launched Emacs:
1. M-x debbugs-gnu-bugs 65479
2. Press 'a' to load the bug despite the lack of SSL certificates.
3. Navigate to the message titled:
[bug#65479] [PATCH core-updates 02/61] gnu: Add docbook-xml-5.
4. Press S W to send a wide reply.
5. Observe that the Subject header in the email response being edited
has been changed to "Re: bug#65479: [PATCH core-updates 00/61] The
Draining of the XML & DocBook Swamp.", that is, the original subject of
the "bug" (its first message).
I haven't been able to explain what causes that, but I've found where it
occurs. Following the original 'gnus-article-wide-reply-with-original'
call, it eventually calls to 'message-setup-1', and the Subject
modification happens by unknown code (hooks?) just before the line 6870
("(run-hooks 'message-setup-hook)") runs:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defun message-setup-1 (headers &optional yank-action actions return-action)
(dolist (action actions)
(condition-case nil
;; FIXME: Use functions rather than expressions!
(add-to-list 'message-send-actions
`(apply #',(car action) ',(cdr action)))))
(setq message-return-action return-action)
[...]
(run-hooks 'message-signature-setup-hook)
(message-insert-signature)
(save-restriction
(message-narrow-to-headers)
(run-hooks 'message-header-setup-hook))
(setq buffer-undo-list nil)
(when message-generate-hashcash
;; Generate hashcash headers for recipients already known
(mail-add-payment-async))
===> Subject header changed HERE
;; Gnus posting styles are applied via buffer-local `message-setup-hook'
;; values.
(run-hooks 'message-setup-hook)
;; Do this last to give it precedence over posting styles, etc.
(when (message-mail-p)
(save-restriction
(message-narrow-to-headers)
(if message-alternative-emails
(message-use-alternative-email-as-from))))
(message-position-point)
;; Allow correct handling of `message-checksum' in `message-yank-original':
(set-buffer-modified-p nil)
(undo-boundary)
;; rmail-start-mail expects message-mail to return t (Bug#9392)
t)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Would someone be able to explain what is responsible for this? It seems
to me it'd be preferable if the subject of the message I'm replying to
was kept rather than replaced this way, to preserve context.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Maxim,
>> FTR, this behavior is due to setting a default subject via
>> gnus-posting-styles in debbugs-gnu-summary-mode. Could you please check
>> whether the appended patch helps?
>
> I've applied the patch and retried my original reproducer; it passes the
> test! So it seems useful to me already in the current form, thank you!
>
> Another thing that could be nice for the future would be some way for
> the user to customize the gnus-posting-styles used by Debbugs. That way
> I believe you could modify its behavior only for some particular
> "group", e.g. when sending to 'guix-patches'; but that seems trickier
> to implement.
>
> So I think the solution you propose is satisfactory!
Thanks for the feedback. I've applied the patch to the GNU ELPA
repository, and released debbugs 0.37. Shall be visible in a couple of
hours.
Further changes might be possible. But as you've said it is more
complex, because some of the settings in gnus-posting-styles must be
preserved. So we'll better wait for further requests if any.
Closing the bug.
Best regards, Michael.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 286 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.