GNU bug report logs - #66311
Request for merging "qt-team" branch

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66311 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66311 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <guix-patches <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Request for merging "qt-team" branch
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 11:58:10 -0400

Hello,

I think this branch should be fine to merge.  Let's see what QA thinks
of it.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #8 received at 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66311: Request for merging "qt-team" branch
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2023 17:52:42 +0200

Hi!

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> I think this branch should be fine to merge.  Let's see what QA thinks
> of it.

Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
‘master’):

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=qt-team

Ludo’.

Message #11 received at 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66311: Request for merging "qt-team" branch
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 08:23:14 -0400

Hi Ludo!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi!
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> I think this branch should be fine to merge.  Let's see what QA thinks
>> of it.
>
> Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
> ‘master’):
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=qt-team

Thanks for the heads-up!  I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons.  The last one is:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2186594/log/raw

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Substitute: 
substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'...   0.0%
substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Which is our longstanding bug #54447.  Previously it had been canceled
for reasons I ignore.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Message #14 received at 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66311: Request for merging "qt-team" branch
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 19:58:55 +0200

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi Ludo!
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> I think this branch should be fine to merge.  Let's see what QA thinks
>>> of it.
>>
>> Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
>> ‘master’):
>>
>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=qt-team
>
> Thanks for the heads-up!  I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
> aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons.  The last one is:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2186594/log/raw
>
> Substitute: 
> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'...   0.0%
> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
> cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?

Restarted now…

Ludo’.

Message #19 received at 66311-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 66311-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66311: Request for merging "qt-team" branch
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 11:19:43 -0400

Hi,

[...]

>> Thanks for the heads-up!  I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
>> aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons.  The last one is:
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2186594/log/raw
>>
>> Substitute: 
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'...   0.0%
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
>> cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?

It's been scheduled for nearly 2 days.  I've now pushed the series.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.