GNU bug report logs -
#66250
[PATCH] doc: Document specification->package+output.
Previous Next
Reported by: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:34:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 66250 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 66250 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
:
bug#66250
; Package
guix-patches
.
(Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
guix-patches <at> gnu.org
.
(Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:34:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Reported by nutcase on IRC.
* doc/guix.texi (Using the Configuration System): Add a section about
using specification->package+output.
---
doc/guix.texi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index f49ed894a7..d9865f4ac0 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -16936,6 +16936,23 @@ Using the Configuration System
%base-packages)))
@end lisp
+@findex specification->package+output
+When a package has more than one output it can be a challenge to refer to
+specific output instead of just to the standard @code{out} output. For these
+situations one can use the @code{specification->package+output} procedure from
+the @code{(gnu packages)} module. For example:
+
+@lisp
+(use-modules (gnu packages))
+
+(operating-system
+ ;; ...
+ (packages (append (map specification->package+output
+ '("nss-certs" "git" "git:send-email"))
+ %base-packages)))
+
+@end lisp
+
@unnumberedsubsec System Services
@cindex services
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
Reply sent
to
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Fri, 13 Oct 2023 08:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #10 received at 66250-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Patch pushed.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> רנשלפ םירפא
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 219 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.