Subject: bug#66247: 29.1; Transient frame problems with Emacs 29 on MS Windows

From: Drew Adams <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:27:03 +0000

> > I wonder whether it might make sense for the doc
> > to say something about this?

?

> > Maybe more importantly I wonder whether it might
> > make sense to add a user option that has the
> > effect of turning on/off double-buffering for
> > all frames.
> 
> We already have that, for every frame-parameter: customize both
> initial-frame-alist and default-frame-alist.  Why do we need something
> else, and why should this particular parameter be different from all
> the other frame parameters?

There are several more `*-frame-alist' variables
than those two.  `M-x apropos frame-alist'.
And user code can create still more.