GNU bug report logs - #66159
30.0.50; lua-ts-mode semantic indentation problems

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Andrey Listopadov <andreyorst <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 19:41:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Found in version 30.0.50

Fixed in version 30.1

Done: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #61 received at 66159 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink>
To: 66159 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Andrey Listopadov <andreyorst <at> gmail.com>,
 Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Various improvements to lua-ts-mode (Bug#66159)
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2023 22:28:02 -0500
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On 6/10/23 16:44, john muhl via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss
> army knife of text editors wrote:
>
>> +(defcustom lua-ts-inferior-history nil
>> +  "File used to save command history of the inferior Lua process."
>> +  :type '(choice (const nil) file)
>
> Please, give a :tag for the const option.  IMO, it makes for a better
> Customize UI.

Fixed here and for the other choices.

Andrey Listopadov <andreyorst <at> gmail.com> writes:

> john muhl <jm <at> pub.pink> writes:
>
>>> It seems the last patch broke the movement.
>>
>> The tests for those pass and are still working here. Maybe you found
>> another case that needs to be improved. What is the specific problem?
>
> It seems so, sorry for not including this, I thought I sent this before.
> Here's an example:
>
>
> █for i=1,10 do
>      print(x)
>  end
>
> Pressing Pressing C-M-f (forward-sexp) puts the point here:
>
>  for i=1,10 do
>      print(x)█
>  end
>
> I think it should go over the `for' loop right to the `end'.
>
> Pressing Pressing C-M-b (backward-sexp), however, puts the point here:
>
>  for i=1,10 do
>     █print(x)
>  end
>
> Pressing C-M-b again doesn't move the point anymore.
>
> Same thing happens with for-each style loop:
>
> █for k,v in pairs({1,2,3}) do
>      print(x)
>  end
>
> C-M-f:
>
>  for k,v in pairs({1,2,3})█do
>      print(x)
>  end
>
> C-M-f:
>
>  for k,v in pairs({1,2,3}) do
>      print(x)█
>  end
>
> Backward movement manages to take the point way back to the pairs:
>
> C-M-b, C-M-b:
>
>  for k,v in pairs█({1,2,3}) do
>      print(x)
>  end
>
> I went to https://devhints.io/lua and copied a bunch of examples of
> other loops to the scratch buffer, and the movement is as follows:
>
> █while condition do
>  end
>
>  for i = 1,5 do
>  end
>
>  for i = start,finish,delta do
>  end
>
>  for k,v in pairs(tab) do
>  end
>
>  repeat
>  until condition
>
>  -- Breaking out:
>  while x do
>    if condition then break end
>  end
>
> C-M-f:
>
>  while condition do
>  end
>
>  for i = 1,5 do
>  end
>
>  for i = start,finish,delta do
>  end
>
>  for k,v in pairs(tab)█do
>  end
>
>  repeat
>  until condition
>
>  -- Breaking out:
>  while x do
>    if condition then break end
>  end
>
> C-M-f:
>
>  while condition do
>  end
>
>  for i = 1,5 do
>  end
>
>  for i = start,finish,delta do
>  end
>
>  for k,v in pairs(tab) do
>  end
>
>  repeat
>  until condition
>
>  -- Breaking out:
>  while x do
>    if condition then break end█
>  end

Navigation should be all around improved now. Let me know if I missed something.

[0001-Various-improvements-to-lua-ts-mode-Bug-66159.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 1 year and 267 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.