GNU bug report logs - #66143
[PATCH]: Update emacs-slime and sbcl-slime-swank to 2.28-0.1e4b741

Previous Next

Full log

Message #8 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 66143 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#66143] [PATCH]: Update emacs-slime and sbcl-slime-swank to
 2.28-0.1e4b741
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 11:01:13 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

André A. Gomes <andremegafone <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Guix,
>
> Please find the patch attached.  Thanks!

It seems like you've attached two patches? It's useful to just send one
patch per email, as lots of tooling expects that.

Looking at the first patch though, packaging anything but the latest
release shouldn't be the norm [1].

1: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/guix.html#index-version-number_002c-for-VCS-snapshots

You need to put the reasoning for updating these packages to these
specific commits in to some comments. Depending on that justification as
well, we need to decide whether to ship these versions in addition to
the latest releases, or as you're doing currently to replace the latest
releases with these snapshots.

What approach to take depends on the justification, e.g. if the latest
release is unusable or using it could be problematic, then replacing it
with a snapshot seems better, otherwise, we should create package
variants (e.g. emacs-slime-next) for these snapshots.

Does that make sense?

Thanks,

Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.