GNU bug report logs - #66125
29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect

Previous Next

Full log

Message #43 received at 66125-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>
Cc: 66125-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#66125: 29.1; configure --with-small-ja-dic has no effect
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2023 15:33:41 +0300

> From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm <at> gentoo.org>
> Cc: 66125 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 23:29:33 +0200
> 
> >>>>> On Sat, 23 Sep 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> > (The "if test" part of the new target's rules could be updated to
> >> > check that the small-ja-dic-option file exists, and generate a
> >> > non-empty file if not.)
> >> 
> >> IMHO this would be cleaner.
> 
> > Can you try that and see if there are no other issues?
> 
> I did some tests and ended up replacing the small-ja-dic-option recipe
> in leim/Makefile.in with something very simple:
> 
> # This is used to support regeneration of ja-dic when the SMALL_JA_DIC
> # option is flipped by the configure-time option.
> small-ja-dic-option: ../config.status
> 	$(AM_V_GEN)echo "small ja-dic option: $(SMALL_JA_DIC)" > $@.$$$$ && \
> 	${top_srcdir}/build-aux/move-if-change $@.$$$$ $@
> 
> AFAICS this does what is intended, i.e. the detour via recording the
> option in ja-dic.el isn't even needed.

Thanks, I went with your suggestion in leim/Makefile.in.  But I kept
the recording of the value in ja-dic.el, as I think it's a good idea
nonetheless, for future investigations of possible issues.

And with that, I'm closing the bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.