GNU bug report logs - #66072
Duplicate/conflicting definitions for ocl-icd

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Subject: bug#66072: closed (Re: Duplicate/conflicting definitions for ocl-icd)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:49:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#66072: Duplicate/conflicting definitions for ocl-icd

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 66072 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
66072: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=66072
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>
Cc: 66072-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
Subject: Re: Duplicate/conflicting definitions for ocl-icd
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:44:02 +0000

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

As the duplicate has been removed, I'm closing the issue.
If one day we find a conflict between open-icd-loader and ocl-icd, we'll
open a new bug report.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Lars-Dominik Braun <lars <at> 6xq.net>
Subject: Duplicate/conflicting definitions for ocl-icd
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 12:34:57 +0000

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi.
There are currently two conflicting definitions of ocl-icd in
"opencl.scm":

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-public ocl-icd
  (deprecated-package "ocl-icd" opencl-icd-loader))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define-public ocl-icd
  (package
    (name "ocl-icd")
    (version "2.3.2")
    (source
     (origin
       (method git-fetch)
       (uri (git-reference
             (url "https://github.com/OCL-dev/ocl-icd")
             (commit (string-append "v" version))))
       (file-name (git-file-name name version))
       (sha256
        (base32 "0y0lnxb6zlhfb5vxxib5n1vvxa4b23qc0j3lsih6yjz9j37mj7wz"))))
    (build-system gnu-build-system)
    (native-inputs
     (list autoconf automake libtool ruby))
    (home-page "https://github.com/OCL-dev/ocl-icd")
    (synopsis "Generic OpenCL @acronym{ICD, Installable Client Driver} loader")
    (description
     "This package provides an OpenCL @acronym{ICD, Installable Client Driver}
loader.  It maintains a YAML database of all known and guessed function pointers
from vendor-specific drivers.  It also delivers a skeleton of bindings to
incorporate inside an OpenCL implementation to give it ICD functionalities.")
    (license license:bsd-2)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Which is the good one?

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.